It may seem unusual to say that Newtonian gravity brought ISKCON down, but the reader will come to see just how true this statement can be.
 |
Newtonian gravity can be basically defined as gravity as caused (caused?) by the density of mass per a given volume. We do associate more gravity effects to a hunk of lead than to a hunk of wood. But there are problems with this basic definition. For example, the mere existence of mass doesn't explain how gravity effects take place over distance. The Earth has mass of a certain density, and so does an ink pen. But when an ink pen falls off the surface of a table to the floor, what went on between the pen and the floor to induce the gravity effect? Science doesn't explain this, no more than Sir Isaac Newton could a few hundred years ago.
In order to explain Kepler's equations in celestial mechanics, physicists have to stipulate that planets have cores of varying density, and will stipulate that one planet has a core of iron, the other of liquid hydrogen, and so on. First of all, they have no idea about what is there in a planet's core because they cannot observe anything. They can observe more about the Andromeda Galaxy than they can about their own planet's interior, right underneath their own feet. The reader will keep in mind that seismographs must be interpreted and cannot be categorized as offering direct observation. Really, there is no direct observation of the interior of planets, no direct experience. Even volcanic eruptions of lava must be a surface phenomenon, relatively speaking; lava passing through the crust would simply have to cool. And according to the behavior of sedimentation in a centrifuge, the dense part of a planet's mass should have accumulated along the outer strata in the first place. But science must accommodate its theory of gravity effects being due to the density of mass, so they illogically invent dense mass, even without its observation. And whenever science subjugates verifiable fact, such as observation, to accommodate theory, the reader should know that something ends up rotten in Denmark!
Consider an alternative concept of gravity; that of gravity effects as being due to electromagnetic forces, i.e., electromagnetic radiation. An example of electromagnetic attraction occurs when someone rubs a balloon against the living room carpet and then sticks it against the curtains. That sticking is electromagnetic. Or how about when a lady lifts her hair up with the nose of a hair dryer, from a distance, after the dryer has been in operation for a couple of minutes. The electrons accumulate around the nozzle and spew out (over a distance, right?), and this is attractive to matter; the lady's hair.
Now … the electrons have a negative charge to them; that much we know. But what about the lady's hair? Why was it attracted to the negatively charged electrons produced by the hair dryer? In his book The Ultimate Life Force, earlier entitled The Awesome Life Force, Joseph H. Cater explains that the atom actually has a net, positive charge to it. (See the footnote below from Chapter Twelve of Cater's book, preceded by an asterisk) The attraction is accounted for because the atoms comprising the lady's hair have a net positive charge to them, and because the electrons are negatively charged.
How interesting that planets also radiate particles, i.e., negatively charged particles. (The plot thickens!) I remember that I used to go to the Smithsonian Institute in the first half of the 1990s in Washington, D.C. In the Air and Space Museum, there used to be an exhibit called The Family of the Sun. As a part of it, there was a room with headphones for each planet, and the phones would play a recording of the radiation emitted by each one. For example, I remember that Saturn's radiation sounded like a low, buzzing sound. So planets emit radiations, i.e., waves of negatively charged electron particles at a certain frequency or Hertz.
And there it is. Matter, including the lady's hair and the rest of her, carries a slight positive charge, and the radiations being emitted by our planet are negatively charged. Thus gravity effects manifest. In his book The Ultimate Reality/The Awesome life Force, Joseph H. Cater explains the specifics of how it is that the radiations emanating from planets have a frontal attraction, and he outlines a whole scheme of alternative particle physics in order to provide a basis for the reader's understanding.
Now, why are modern physicists so aghast against this concept of gravity effects being caused by electromagnetic radiation? Because aghast and against it they are. If any student of physics or astronomy starts espousing in favor of the electromagnetic understanding of gravity, he or she will probably not graduate, surely not with a doctorate, and surely won't work anywhere! The person will lose his or her career and get blackballed. And this is so anywhere in the world. University administrators in any school of physics or hard science, anywhere in the world, seem to be of one, vehement mindset on this. In fact, more than being of one mind, they seem to be in league with each other. The whole field of study seems to be infiltrated with department chairmen winking and nodding at each other, and this supra loyalty seems to go far beyond national boundaries. How could it be that this area of possibility, of study, which is so congruent compared to the untenable Newtonian gravity, doesn't even get consideration in one university program anywhere? What is behind all this and why?
Consider the implications. Any two-bit dictator who became aware that gravity effects are caused by an electromagnetic radiation in a certain frequency range (Hertz) could easily achieve anti gravity effects with a frequency oscillator. He could easily transmit, or shall I say emit, the proper frequency of wave (between radio and infrared at three trillion cycles per second) and imbue an aircraft or missile with this frequency; which would then become weightless (the effect would be similar to two positive ends of a magnetic facing each other). So theoretically, even a medium range missile could be propelled around the world and reach New York with fuel to spare. Why not? It would be weightless; it wouldn't have to push against anything.
The yoke that subjugates the citizens of the world is petroleum. Our economies and cities are based on petroleum (and elevators), and citizens have to play ball with the New World Order (NWO) in order to acquire fuel, which translates into freedom, at least limited freedom. Crossing the North American continent in four days sure beats crossing it in a year or so by horse-drawn wagon. Countries also become subject to cat-and-mouse games because of their need for petroleum. The current problem facing China, for example, is that, in order for it to achieve the kind of economic dominance over the world that it desires, it has to depend more and more on energy sources at far-flung distances, and it hardly has a decent navy to protect its interests with. Does the NWO want to lose control by empowering inimical countries and individual citizens with practically free energy, by being able to eliminate all inertia and resistance to travel and movement, through anti gravitics? This is not likely.
But if it becomes known that the smaller planets and orbs in our solar system are inhabited by civilizations, or even that they were, and that they hold down considerable atmospheres in spite of their size, then the whole justification for Newtonian gravity evaporates. The idea is that, according to the Newtonian scheme, Mars and our Moon don't have enough mass to generate enough gravity in order to hold down an atmosphere, period! So if it is proven that they do have considerable atmospheres, then physicists will be impelled to look elsewhere for a clue, they will be justified in doing so. And the theory that gravity effects are generated by electromagnetic causes is always lurking around the corner; there are maverick scientists, in fact, who are sounding the call.
NASA went to great lengths to impose the opposite impression. Before the supposed Apollo flights, there was a growing consensus among mainstream astronomers involved in visual, telescopic observing that the Moon had an atmosphere. There was even organized observation being conducted in order to prove this. I won't go into detail because it would be beyond the scope of our readers to take it all in. But this was the scenario before Apollo.
What the Apollo mission did was supposedly establish that the Moon is a lifeless wasteland, a vacuum of a desert. It carried with it the authority of government and institutions, institutions that the people believed in. And it smashed asunder the idea that there could be atmospheres on the Moon or Mars.
And then A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Srila Prabhupada made his appearance to set the situation straight. He branded the scientific community as being full of liars, rascals and thieves. He spoke about them so aggressively that he could catch one's attention, too: "I kick in their faces."
And Prabhupada-the-Sheriff brought a posse with him, one that he rounded up himself. It was a posse in the form of a large-scale book distribution apparatus being none other than the Hare Krishna movement. Among the posse members were Swarup Damodar prabhu and Sadaputa das, a former NASA scientist.
Srila Prabhupada established the Bhaktivedanta Institute and gave it the agenda of smashing and exposing rascal science. Keep in mind that he had dedicated quite a large portion of his comments against planetary astronomy's hoax of lifeless planets, devoid of human civilization. He instructed that the temples should be kept abreast of developments, and this implied that the devotees be schooled. Something else was implicit as his devotee scientists were gearing up to vindicate their guru's statements to the effect that "they did not go to the Moon," and that there was civilization on other planets; what was implicit was that his book distribution apparatus posed a threat, a very big threat, were he to distribute the type of findings he wanted to produce through the Bhaktivedanta Institute. By the way, around that time the Hare Krishna movement was distributing a couple of million or so books per year.
Now, let's factor in that, around this general time period, Srila Prabhupada stated that his movement had been infiltrated and that among the leadership, "there are demons against us", something to this effect; but that they wouldn't be able to stop Chaitanya Mahaprabhu's Sankirtan movement. I believe that there were several comments along these lines. I have heard rumors that the Indian security agency had advised Srila Prabhupada to this effect, and that supposedly Bhagavan was a CIA operative. (I cannot verify this at all.)
All things said and done, Srila Prabhupada was dangerous enough to NWO agendas as to merit such specific attention. Not only did he preside over an army of dedicated book distributors, but he even had good access to George Harrison and to John Lennon a bit. There could have even been Beatle songs about all this, who knows!
The two events that took place in Srila Prabhupada's Hare Krishna movement shortly after this time - and that smack of infiltration by NWO agents, CIA and otherwise - are that: Srila Prabhupada died, probably by poison; and that the book distribution apparatus was run into the ground. It wasn't stopped by opposition, it was run into the ground by those who claimed to lead and even champion the book distribution effort. Devotees were mistreated and practically stripped of their sadhana as they were turned into karma-yoga worker ants at best. They were pressured to work and distribute books around the clock at such a pace that the whole philosophical orientation that they used to cultivate from reading the books fell by the wayside; a generation of devotees was suddenly turned out that didn't even know the philosophy, while creepy guy leaders were becoming scholarly. The devotees were alienated from their beloved ISKCON!
The concept of a Manchurian Candidate or a sleeper agent is appropriate in this regard. It's not as if the Hare Krishna movement fell to pieces in one fell stroke. I'm reminded of the activities of the initiating guru formerly known as Harikesa Maharaj. He sat on top of a large chunk of the Eastern European yatra for quite a while. At a certain point, he took all the money from the Eastern European BBT and invested it in information technology penny stocks ($28 million?), and lost it all. Now the Eastern European yatra is so poor that the GBC entertained the idea of selling the farm community in Spain in order to pass the money over to Eastern Europe to help revive things. In this way it seems that the movement has been dismantled gradually, as if by sleeper agents waiting for their cues.
This last statement deserves special attention on the part of the reader. It would be naïve to think that 35 years ago the NWO infiltrators had such a grip on the Hare Krishna movement, but now they don't. Let's confront ourselves: if they have had over 30 years to work on it, they must have a stronger grip than before. And just because things seem to be in a holding pattern, that doesn't mean that A, B or C couldn't happen again. In fact, this current scandal or that one, this recent death or that one, suggests that they still have a grip and engage in routine maintenance. Surely the infighting factions that we perceive within ISKCON have more behind them than what we are able to perceive.
Perhaps now the readers have a better understanding of this article's title, "Newtonian Gravity Brought ISKCON Down". The threat that Srila Prabhupada posed went deeper than just street sankirtan and Sunday feasts; he readied himself and his ISKCON institutions to take a sledge hammer to the pillars of NWO domination, and this was to his credit (and competence).
Not unlike Sri Ramachandra, Srila Prabhupada dropped himself off behind enemy lines and organized guerrilla warfare against the enemy. In fact, as far as apparent estimations are concerned, I would place Srila Prabhupada among the three greatest Indian nationals of the modern era; in terms of his impact and influence, he comes in only after Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Indira Gandhi. So far …
Replies