Illuminati: The Lucifer Deception
The Lucifer Deception
[An Essay On Christianity vs Freemasonry/Baalism]
by James Dierbeck
Comment: Here's another little piece to the puzzle, and like James says, the whole subject is very complex. With this not said what is written in this essay is the ultimate truth, but an interpretation of how things are viewed in Christianity and on certain levels of secret societies.
However, we need to remember that the deception is vast; it is like peeling off an onion, and there are an insane amount of layers before you get to the real truth.
Even within secret societies, what is believed on one level is discarded on the next. Why? Because it is extremely important to keep the lies and deception going, and it is designed so that not even the smartest of the uninitiated is supposed to find the truth. The truth is available ONLY to a very very few, and we don't even know who they are - YET!. Wes Penre, www.illuminati-news.com
his topic is complex, with many aspects to cover, & I'll likely need to make it a 2 part article. The roots of the Lucifer deception are in the Inquisition. In my quest for the secret scriptures, I discovered a common thread with various exterminated Christian sects, and their scriptures.
I already discussed the main Nicean Creed which was used as an excuse to kill other Christians; the doctrine that there's no lesser Lord, as contradicted by Rev 11:15, Acts 4:26, Psalm 110:1 KJV & by Christ calling the "Comforter" the "Holy Ghost" in John 14:26, & Zechariah 11, etc. The motive being, to rob his scripture given influence on the stolen sheep, in the latter days. The Bogomil sect celebrated May 5 as "Day of the Sun"...who is the lesser Lord. They were all exterminated in the Balkans.
Well, the most common scripture of all from various exterminated churches in various nations that the Inquisition seized was titled "Christ and Satan", which was the New Testament portion of the Saxon "Heliand" pre-Bible. A censored version has recently become available to read, which admits to "lacunas" which are missing portions. Few can read ancient Saxon.
In 1992, I'd learned of a pre-Inquisition scripture in the Oxford Bodellian Library, titled "Junius 2", but no copies available. Thru my law firm handlers, I asked the anti-pope singer Sinead O'Connor to try to read it and report to me what it says. She did, but the law firm refused to allow me to read her report to me about it... I'm uninitiated.
Sinead was suddenly made some kind of cleric rank, and quit the music biz. I guess she had to change her status in order to read it. Im hoping I didn't send her into a horror situation for trying. I was learning at the time how dangerous knowledge can be myself. The "Junius 2" also contains the book "Christ and Satan" in older English, and the real reason for the Inquisition.
To be sure, the "lacunas" are the important verses that are missing from view by the apparently ONGOING INQUISITION. We can be sure the topic of "Christ and Satan" is involved. So lets look at Christ and Satan in the Bible closely instead...
In Job 1:6, Satan attends a gathering of the Lord and the "sons of God" (ELOHIM), and the Lord delivers Job into the curse power of Satan, that he may become a prophet via suffering unto the blues spirit (Job 3:20-22).
In 2 Corinthians 12:7-9, Paul welcomes the curse of suffering he blames on Satan, "that the power of Christ may rest upon me".
The Lord and Satan appear together in Zechariah 3, to judge a man as to worthiness of being saved. And in Jude 1:9, the devil argues with archangel Michael over the fate of Moses, and loses. (The laws of Moses led to many unjust deaths until the time of Christ, when he saved the adulteress).
The Bible paints a different image of Satan than the Masonic Baalist image of Satan, by design. LaVey was an admitted freemason, and he's been photographed wearing a Catholic priest collar; important clues. In the bogus "Satanic Bible" LaVey knows nothing about Satan, and his "Church of Satan" rejects the Biblical Satan totally (by design of propaganda they cannot conform). The bogus "Satanic Bible" instead promotes using candles made from Christian babyfat in the murder rituals INVENTED by him, styled after Baalism, such as at Bohemian Grove. There were no Satanic rituals in ancient times. But the Bible endorsed exterminating Baalism repeatedly; (2 Kings 10:19-30 KJV or 4 Kings other versions, & Elijah slew 450 "prophets of Baal", after winning the contest of power. The Philistines of Sampson, and the uncircumcised that David slew were all Baalist baby sacrificers.
What we call Satanism is not Biblical Satanism, but Masonic Baalism, in the name of Satan. But why? Because the devil is predicted to arrive also in the end times...
"Therefore rejoice ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. And woe unto the inhibiters of the earth and of the sea; For the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, for he knoweth that he hath but a short time"-Rev 12:12. They framed the devil in advance, who also conversed with the Lord in Matt 3:3-11.
Some say the Bohemian Grove rituals are Satanic, but only Baalism has the tradition of tall statues with a fire altar at the belly of the statue. Baalisms' Ishtar is pictured with owls in Sumerian glyphs.
That's why the owl statue. It's instead of the traditional Moloch horned half man, half bull. THAT's where the image of Satan with horns came from. They decided to be low key at Bohemian Grove, by using the owl statue.
With Bohemian Grove, we can prove that the false Jew ILLuminati of Rev 2:9 & 3:9 IS the "synagogue of Satan", or at least, what's called Satan. In 1738, Pope Clement XII declared freemasonry to be the "synagogue of Satan". And in 1961, the Vatican Roman Curia, in their book "the Plot Against the Church", declared Scottish Rite freemasonry to be the synagogue of Satan. This shows the (lost) struggle within the Church between the sons of darkness and the sons of light. Jesuits were expelled from the Catholic church awhile.
Aleister Crowley was a prominent freemason openly also. Like Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, those who rise in rank in so called Satanism, or various occult groups, will likely discover Crowley's' secret society lodge, Ordo Templi Orientis Lodge, or the Order of the Golden Dawn welcoming them at the org core.
There's absolutely no scriptural references to Satan buying souls, but freemasonry is all about buying souls. Terror and rewards is Baalism & freemasonry. In Acts 5:2-11, it is Satan who tempts the couple to lie to Peter, and strikes them both dead on the spot then. No deal with Satan there.
God reserves the right to give blessings and curses in Deuteronomy 30:7, and Judges 9:57, and Psalm 37:22 KJV or 36 other versions, and 2 Samuel 16:12,& Rev 11:5-6. Christ is the blessings, and Biblical Satan, the curses. For examples;
"Of whom is Alexander and Hymaneus, whom I have delivered unto Satan that they may learn NOT to blaspheme"-1 Timothy 1:20. (They mocked him, got cursed by the name of Satan, and shipwrecked).
"To deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, THAT THE SPIRIT MAY BE SAVED, in the day of the Lord"-1 Corinthians 5:5.
Early Christians cursed in the name of Satan, so, what's up? Either Paul is screwed up, or you are, if that's not fitting your doctrine about Satan.
A Masonic Rosicrucian I've known educated me about the difference between the extant book of Jasher and the Rosicrucian version of the book of Jasher. The verses that teach believers to curse in the name of Satan are missing from what's available to read. But the Rosicrucian version cannot be read, except by the initiated, so I never actually read it myself. Paul got the idea to curse via Satan somehow, didn't he?
He wouldn't just decide that's OK without some basis. "And no marvel, for Satan himself is TRANSFORMED into an angel of light"-2 Corinthians 11:14.
We hear the IRS approved preachers always telling us what Satan wants from us, and lots of unscriptural BS, which is safer than opposing REAL EVIL of men. They're propping up the Masonic image of Satan every step, like the deceivers they are, imposing Inquisitional doctrines on the stolen sheep. The very topic is a great deceiver now.
The name Lucifer is removed from the modern Bibles, to deceive us, but is in the 1611 KJV & the Latin Vulgate Bible, in Isaiah 14:12.
It's the ONLY mention of Lucifer by that name, (which means "light-bearer"). Isaiah gave him that name, and NEVER SAID that Lucifer is Satan! 14:16 is clear that Lucifer is a man, (not a serpent), who is risen from death when the cities of the world are all collapsed by the trib impact event of Rev 18:21. It's unfulfilled as yet. So, unlike the devil, Lucifer is fallen unto us via resurrection, whereas the devil comes down unto us from the sky. Rev 20:10 is clear that the beast is NOT the devil, nor the false prophet; so IF Lucifer is the beast (he's not the beast either), he's not the devil. I rest my Biblical case on that.
The official Masonic party line about Lucifer currently, is that Lucifer WAS a king of Babylon, which I can prove false also. the site Masonicinfo tries to downplay the Lucifer writings of Pike by saying Lucifer WAS a king of Babylon. The prediction about the cities of the world collapsed is unfulfilled, as is the verse that follows Isaiah telling Lucifer to prophesy to the king of Babylon; "The Lord hath broken the staff of the wicked, and the scepter of RULERS"-Isaiah 14:5.
Also unfulfilled yet by any king of Babylon is 14:9, which implies that Lucifer uses ghost power. Isaiah is directly speaking to Lucifer in verses 14:12 &14:9 and 14:19, & the entire chapter.
14:16-17 is an end times prediction matching with Rev 18:21 & 16:18, etc. Isaiah 14:5 matches end times predictions also of Rev 11:15 and Isaiah 23:9 & Psalm 110:5-6 KJV and Psalm 135:10 KJV.
So, the freemasons try, but fail to prove that Lucifer WAS a king of Babylon. Babylon was the capitol of Baalism, BTW. Bush is currently the king of Babylon, literally, by occupying Iraq.
That brings me to discuss Bush the beast. Think not? See http://www.bushisantichrist.com about his name in Hebrew adding up to 666 using 3 different methods of numerology. Hebrew letters double as numbers. Now read about the beast of Daniel 7:25, who "thinks to change times and laws", and subdues 3 kingdoms until the 3½ year trib. As I said, Rev 20:10 is clear that the beast is not the devil. Once the trib begins via the impact event, the mark of the beast will be clear enough to all, as the NWO tries to maintain control via the mark. Boycotting it could save your life, when the Lord and the angels take action, (Matt 13:49-50, Rev 9:15, Zechariah 5:2-4, and 2 Thess 1:7).
I don't consider Bush the devil, though very evil, nor Lucifer. I do believe that Lucifer is the "lawless one" predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2, because of similarities with Isaiah 14. But in 2 Thess 2 is a mystery verse; "And for this cause shall God send them string delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they might all be damned, who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness"-2 Thess 2:11-12.
That's a match with Acts 3:23; "And it shall come to pass, that EVERY soul, which will not hear that Prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people". The losers won't take warning from him, or anyone else, because the imposed Jesuit doctrines forbid accepting anyone but the Lord himself, (and the Vatican) as valid representatives of God.
In summary, the freemasons don't really worship the Biblical Satan, for they INVENTED false Satanism based on Baalism. Yet they truly are the "synagogue of Satan" thereby, at Bohemian Grove.
I know it's easier to just call the NWO satanic, but that's not the core of understanding the Baalist symbols of freemasonry, and the
Vatican. See http://www.remnantofGod.org/images/IGC/pagan-rcc.htm and
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/pics.htm
The Babylonian sword on the Fez hats is Baalist, and the "star & crescent" symbol is ancient Baalism, etc, etc.
The truth shall set you free, if you accept it". James Dierbeck; outlawed preacher, songwriter/publisher, whose paid for self-published ebook was hacked offline by NSA, from the site that was selling it...and witness to Masonic corruption at high levels, in Seattle.
Amendment 10 negates unconstitutional fed powers, like the 1947 National Security Act, UNpatriot Acts, international "agreements", & federal police agencies like DHS/FBI/BATF/DEA. Federal referendums = power to the people, once elections are unrigged.
Rev 19:11/19, Isaiah 24:21-22, Matt.13:49-50, Psalm 110:1-6 KJV (109 other versions), Ephesians 6:12, 2 Kings 10:19-30 KJV (4 Kings oher versions)... then consider the VIPs doing Baalist rituals at Bohemian Grove!
[An Essay On Christianity vs Freemasonry/Baalism]
by James Dierbeck
Comment: Here's another little piece to the puzzle, and like James says, the whole subject is very complex. With this not said what is written in this essay is the ultimate truth, but an interpretation of how things are viewed in Christianity and on certain levels of secret societies.
However, we need to remember that the deception is vast; it is like peeling off an onion, and there are an insane amount of layers before you get to the real truth.
Even within secret societies, what is believed on one level is discarded on the next. Why? Because it is extremely important to keep the lies and deception going, and it is designed so that not even the smartest of the uninitiated is supposed to find the truth. The truth is available ONLY to a very very few, and we don't even know who they are - YET!. Wes Penre, www.illuminati-news.com
Baal
his topic is complex, with many aspects to cover, & I'll likely need to make it a 2 part article. The roots of the Lucifer deception are in the Inquisition. In my quest for the secret scriptures, I discovered a common thread with various exterminated Christian sects, and their scriptures.
I already discussed the main Nicean Creed which was used as an excuse to kill other Christians; the doctrine that there's no lesser Lord, as contradicted by Rev 11:15, Acts 4:26, Psalm 110:1 KJV & by Christ calling the "Comforter" the "Holy Ghost" in John 14:26, & Zechariah 11, etc. The motive being, to rob his scripture given influence on the stolen sheep, in the latter days. The Bogomil sect celebrated May 5 as "Day of the Sun"...who is the lesser Lord. They were all exterminated in the Balkans.
Well, the most common scripture of all from various exterminated churches in various nations that the Inquisition seized was titled "Christ and Satan", which was the New Testament portion of the Saxon "Heliand" pre-Bible. A censored version has recently become available to read, which admits to "lacunas" which are missing portions. Few can read ancient Saxon.
Sinead O'Connor
In 1992, I'd learned of a pre-Inquisition scripture in the Oxford Bodellian Library, titled "Junius 2", but no copies available. Thru my law firm handlers, I asked the anti-pope singer Sinead O'Connor to try to read it and report to me what it says. She did, but the law firm refused to allow me to read her report to me about it... I'm uninitiated.
Sinead was suddenly made some kind of cleric rank, and quit the music biz. I guess she had to change her status in order to read it. Im hoping I didn't send her into a horror situation for trying. I was learning at the time how dangerous knowledge can be myself. The "Junius 2" also contains the book "Christ and Satan" in older English, and the real reason for the Inquisition.
To be sure, the "lacunas" are the important verses that are missing from view by the apparently ONGOING INQUISITION. We can be sure the topic of "Christ and Satan" is involved. So lets look at Christ and Satan in the Bible closely instead...
In Job 1:6, Satan attends a gathering of the Lord and the "sons of God" (ELOHIM), and the Lord delivers Job into the curse power of Satan, that he may become a prophet via suffering unto the blues spirit (Job 3:20-22).
In 2 Corinthians 12:7-9, Paul welcomes the curse of suffering he blames on Satan, "that the power of Christ may rest upon me".
The Lord and Satan appear together in Zechariah 3, to judge a man as to worthiness of being saved. And in Jude 1:9, the devil argues with archangel Michael over the fate of Moses, and loses. (The laws of Moses led to many unjust deaths until the time of Christ, when he saved the adulteress).
Anton LaVey
The Bible paints a different image of Satan than the Masonic Baalist image of Satan, by design. LaVey was an admitted freemason, and he's been photographed wearing a Catholic priest collar; important clues. In the bogus "Satanic Bible" LaVey knows nothing about Satan, and his "Church of Satan" rejects the Biblical Satan totally (by design of propaganda they cannot conform). The bogus "Satanic Bible" instead promotes using candles made from Christian babyfat in the murder rituals INVENTED by him, styled after Baalism, such as at Bohemian Grove. There were no Satanic rituals in ancient times. But the Bible endorsed exterminating Baalism repeatedly; (2 Kings 10:19-30 KJV or 4 Kings other versions, & Elijah slew 450 "prophets of Baal", after winning the contest of power. The Philistines of Sampson, and the uncircumcised that David slew were all Baalist baby sacrificers.
What we call Satanism is not Biblical Satanism, but Masonic Baalism, in the name of Satan. But why? Because the devil is predicted to arrive also in the end times...
"Therefore rejoice ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. And woe unto the inhibiters of the earth and of the sea; For the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, for he knoweth that he hath but a short time"-Rev 12:12. They framed the devil in advance, who also conversed with the Lord in Matt 3:3-11.
Some say the Bohemian Grove rituals are Satanic, but only Baalism has the tradition of tall statues with a fire altar at the belly of the statue. Baalisms' Ishtar is pictured with owls in Sumerian glyphs.
That's why the owl statue. It's instead of the traditional Moloch horned half man, half bull. THAT's where the image of Satan with horns came from. They decided to be low key at Bohemian Grove, by using the owl statue.
With Bohemian Grove, we can prove that the false Jew ILLuminati of Rev 2:9 & 3:9 IS the "synagogue of Satan", or at least, what's called Satan. In 1738, Pope Clement XII declared freemasonry to be the "synagogue of Satan". And in 1961, the Vatican Roman Curia, in their book "the Plot Against the Church", declared Scottish Rite freemasonry to be the synagogue of Satan. This shows the (lost) struggle within the Church between the sons of darkness and the sons of light. Jesuits were expelled from the Catholic church awhile.
Aleister Crowley
Aleister Crowley was a prominent freemason openly also. Like Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, those who rise in rank in so called Satanism, or various occult groups, will likely discover Crowley's' secret society lodge, Ordo Templi Orientis Lodge, or the Order of the Golden Dawn welcoming them at the org core.
There's absolutely no scriptural references to Satan buying souls, but freemasonry is all about buying souls. Terror and rewards is Baalism & freemasonry. In Acts 5:2-11, it is Satan who tempts the couple to lie to Peter, and strikes them both dead on the spot then. No deal with Satan there.
God reserves the right to give blessings and curses in Deuteronomy 30:7, and Judges 9:57, and Psalm 37:22 KJV or 36 other versions, and 2 Samuel 16:12,& Rev 11:5-6. Christ is the blessings, and Biblical Satan, the curses. For examples;
"Of whom is Alexander and Hymaneus, whom I have delivered unto Satan that they may learn NOT to blaspheme"-1 Timothy 1:20. (They mocked him, got cursed by the name of Satan, and shipwrecked).
"To deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, THAT THE SPIRIT MAY BE SAVED, in the day of the Lord"-1 Corinthians 5:5.
Early Christians cursed in the name of Satan, so, what's up? Either Paul is screwed up, or you are, if that's not fitting your doctrine about Satan.
A Masonic Rosicrucian I've known educated me about the difference between the extant book of Jasher and the Rosicrucian version of the book of Jasher. The verses that teach believers to curse in the name of Satan are missing from what's available to read. But the Rosicrucian version cannot be read, except by the initiated, so I never actually read it myself. Paul got the idea to curse via Satan somehow, didn't he?
He wouldn't just decide that's OK without some basis. "And no marvel, for Satan himself is TRANSFORMED into an angel of light"-2 Corinthians 11:14.
We hear the IRS approved preachers always telling us what Satan wants from us, and lots of unscriptural BS, which is safer than opposing REAL EVIL of men. They're propping up the Masonic image of Satan every step, like the deceivers they are, imposing Inquisitional doctrines on the stolen sheep. The very topic is a great deceiver now.
The name Lucifer is removed from the modern Bibles, to deceive us, but is in the 1611 KJV & the Latin Vulgate Bible, in Isaiah 14:12.
It's the ONLY mention of Lucifer by that name, (which means "light-bearer"). Isaiah gave him that name, and NEVER SAID that Lucifer is Satan! 14:16 is clear that Lucifer is a man, (not a serpent), who is risen from death when the cities of the world are all collapsed by the trib impact event of Rev 18:21. It's unfulfilled as yet. So, unlike the devil, Lucifer is fallen unto us via resurrection, whereas the devil comes down unto us from the sky. Rev 20:10 is clear that the beast is NOT the devil, nor the false prophet; so IF Lucifer is the beast (he's not the beast either), he's not the devil. I rest my Biblical case on that.
The official Masonic party line about Lucifer currently, is that Lucifer WAS a king of Babylon, which I can prove false also. the site Masonicinfo tries to downplay the Lucifer writings of Pike by saying Lucifer WAS a king of Babylon. The prediction about the cities of the world collapsed is unfulfilled, as is the verse that follows Isaiah telling Lucifer to prophesy to the king of Babylon; "The Lord hath broken the staff of the wicked, and the scepter of RULERS"-Isaiah 14:5.
Also unfulfilled yet by any king of Babylon is 14:9, which implies that Lucifer uses ghost power. Isaiah is directly speaking to Lucifer in verses 14:12 &14:9 and 14:19, & the entire chapter.
14:16-17 is an end times prediction matching with Rev 18:21 & 16:18, etc. Isaiah 14:5 matches end times predictions also of Rev 11:15 and Isaiah 23:9 & Psalm 110:5-6 KJV and Psalm 135:10 KJV.
So, the freemasons try, but fail to prove that Lucifer WAS a king of Babylon. Babylon was the capitol of Baalism, BTW. Bush is currently the king of Babylon, literally, by occupying Iraq.
Bush AntiChrist?
That brings me to discuss Bush the beast. Think not? See http://www.bushisantichrist.com about his name in Hebrew adding up to 666 using 3 different methods of numerology. Hebrew letters double as numbers. Now read about the beast of Daniel 7:25, who "thinks to change times and laws", and subdues 3 kingdoms until the 3½ year trib. As I said, Rev 20:10 is clear that the beast is not the devil. Once the trib begins via the impact event, the mark of the beast will be clear enough to all, as the NWO tries to maintain control via the mark. Boycotting it could save your life, when the Lord and the angels take action, (Matt 13:49-50, Rev 9:15, Zechariah 5:2-4, and 2 Thess 1:7).
I don't consider Bush the devil, though very evil, nor Lucifer. I do believe that Lucifer is the "lawless one" predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2, because of similarities with Isaiah 14. But in 2 Thess 2 is a mystery verse; "And for this cause shall God send them string delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they might all be damned, who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness"-2 Thess 2:11-12.
That's a match with Acts 3:23; "And it shall come to pass, that EVERY soul, which will not hear that Prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people". The losers won't take warning from him, or anyone else, because the imposed Jesuit doctrines forbid accepting anyone but the Lord himself, (and the Vatican) as valid representatives of God.
In summary, the freemasons don't really worship the Biblical Satan, for they INVENTED false Satanism based on Baalism. Yet they truly are the "synagogue of Satan" thereby, at Bohemian Grove.
I know it's easier to just call the NWO satanic, but that's not the core of understanding the Baalist symbols of freemasonry, and the
Vatican. See http://www.remnantofGod.org/images/IGC/pagan-rcc.htm and
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/pics.htm
The Babylonian sword on the Fez hats is Baalist, and the "star & crescent" symbol is ancient Baalism, etc, etc.
The truth shall set you free, if you accept it". James Dierbeck; outlawed preacher, songwriter/publisher, whose paid for self-published ebook was hacked offline by NSA, from the site that was selling it...and witness to Masonic corruption at high levels, in Seattle.
Amendment 10 negates unconstitutional fed powers, like the 1947 National Security Act, UNpatriot Acts, international "agreements", & federal police agencies like DHS/FBI/BATF/DEA. Federal referendums = power to the people, once elections are unrigged.
Rev 19:11/19, Isaiah 24:21-22, Matt.13:49-50, Psalm 110:1-6 KJV (109 other versions), Ephesians 6:12, 2 Kings 10:19-30 KJV (4 Kings oher versions)... then consider the VIPs doing Baalist rituals at Bohemian Grove!
Replies
Hyperborea - the land of the Illuminati
"Neither by land nor by sea shalt thou find the road to the Hyperboreans." (Pindar, Illuminatus)
Hyperborea: the perpetually illuminated paradise beyond the north wind where Apollo, god of Reason, spent his winters. Illumination, the religion of the Illuminati, is the world's only rational, mathematical, scientific and philosophical religion. We utterly condemn all religions of faith, superstition and irrationality. We condemn the slave religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam that worship a Torture God who orders fathers to kill their children and revels in sending those who disobey him to eternal hellfire. We condemn all prophets, "holy" books and "Messiahs". As Kafka said,
The Messiah will come only
when he is no longer necessary;
he will come only
on the day after his arrival;
he will come, not on the last day,
but on the very last.
No one's coming to save us. We must save ourselves. We condemn all those who claim that human beings are not potential Gods. God is not outside you - he IS you. God did not create the universe: the universe created God. The "First God" - Abraxas - is the divine template. We all have the opportunity to join Abraxas in a Community of Gods who know everything and have absolute power. Moreover, this can be proved as a matter of science, philosophy and, above all, mathematics - the sole source of absolute truth.
"Number rules the universe." — Motto of the Pythagorean school.
What happened to Pythagoras's mysterious secret society (whose roots extend far back to the dawn of human civilisation and whose ancient adepts included Solomon the Apostate, the genius who heroically tried to kill Jehovah, the monstrous Torture God)? It became known as the Illuminati - the enlightened ones - and it has survived to this day, despite relentless Abrahamic persecution. Mithraism, alchemy, hermeticism, the Gnostic religion of the medieval Cathar heretics, the outlawed Knights Templar and the original anti-establishment Freemasonry (nothing like pro-establishment modern WASP Freemasonry) were all guises of the Illuminati.
The Illuminati are humanity's true hope and light, the voice of the Enlightenment. Join the army of Light and Reason. The only "sacred text" is mathematics, the language of God, of existence itself.
The Power Question
"For a few to be immortal, many must die." -- from the film In Time.
Who has all the power in the world? The People? The elected representatives of the People? Or is it the banks, corporations, bond markets, dynastic families, hereditary monarchs and the super rich?
Answer? - FOLLOW THE MONEY. The flow of money is the flow of power. Dollars are the amoral units of power and are overwhelmingly held by the amoral (or indeed immoral) super rich. The closer you are to the money flow, the more you can divert into your own pockets, hence the incredible wealth of bankers. The further you are from the flow, the poorer you are. The public good, merit, morality, fairness, justice and rationality play no part at all in the money flow.
The more dollars you have, the more powerful you are. The fewer you have, the more you become invisible. No one sees you and no one listens to you. You are "power deficient", hence irrelevant. Isn't it time to be seen and heard? Isn't it time for the public good and General Will rather than the private good (of the rich) and Particular Will (of the rich) to shape the power equation and dictate the money flow?
Money is a "proximity phenomenon" - the closer you are to its source, to its flow, the better. So, the rich ENSURE they are in closest proximity, while the ordinary people find themselves very far away. Those who are furthest of all from the money require State hand-outs, charity or must beg. They are held in almost universal contempt, yet their central problem is nothing but being too far from the money flow, and that can happen for all sorts of reasons. African Americans, for example, have never been allowed near the money in any significant numbers, hence have never stood a chance. Jews, on the other hand, went out of their way to be close to the money, and succeeded spectacularly. Most of all, the rich CONTROL who gets near the money. You are permitted to come close only if you're a member of their privileged cartel. The whole system is rigged against you. In a free world, the People, not the rich, not the Zionists and WASP Freemasons, must be in charge of who has proximity to the money.
1% (the rich) command and 99% (the poor) obey. Isn't it time for genuine People Power rather than the fake version served up by dumbocracy? Then the People must take the money of the rich - or we'll be their slaves forever. In this time of global financial meltdown, anyone who does not advocate a vast and unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the rich to the People is an Enemy of the People. Any defence of the rich is an attack on the People.
The Old World Order is dead. It's time to push it into its grave.
Free market capitalism has demonstrated that the market controls the economic and hence political agenda. Who and what constitutes the market? What is the market's purpose? Who elected any of the participants in the market? What are the political affiliations of these participants? How wealthy are they? In what way do they express the General Will of the People? Is the market designed to operate in the public good? Do our political leaders have any control over the market? Do they know exactly how the market functions and how it contributes (or not) to the public good? Do they know the identities of all the market participants and their respective agendas? Are they able to inform the People exactly what role the market plays? We all know the answer. Our leaders are clueless. They don't control the market; the market controls them.
The market constitutes an unelected, unaccountable, extra-political entity that nevertheless dominates the political space and can bring down presidents, prime ministers and entire national economies. It can provoke global economic crises and yet governments have ZERO control over it. Don't you find that somewhat odd? How can anyone talk of the people being in charge of the political process if the market dictates government policy? Free markets and democracy are INCOMPATIBLE. You cannot have a democracy if you have a market-controlled economy external to the political process and unaccountable to the electorate.
Democracy likes to trumpet the fact that you can remove unpopular politicians and governments, implying that you get the government you choose, yet there is no mechanism whatever for removing the controllers of the marketplace, the people who run free market capitalism hence the people who actually run democracy. If you can't remove them then you have no power at all and you are at their mercy.
The rich aren't stupid. They gave people democracy because they knew it changed nothing. The market retains all of the real power and THEY are the market. If the rich can't be removed from the market for corruption, greed, the pursuit of naked self-interest and actively acting against the public good then the people have no power. Democracy is a sham. The truth is that the market and its controllers are beyond the reach of the electorate while completely controlling the fate of the electorate. They are outside democracy and yet they run the democratic system. Is that not genius? The legions of dumbed down, manipulated and brainwashed masses who will fight to the death for democracy haven't noticed that their political system is a farce and gives them no power at all. Democracy is simply a disguised plutocracy - rule by the rich - operating via the "sacrosanct", unregulated market where the rich hold all of the cards and the poor have no say.
It need not be like this. "Social" capitalism, as opposed to free market capitalism, is structured to ensure that there are no extra-political entities that dictate to governments and are capable of destroying the economy. Markets must be subordinated to politics, not the other way around. Every element of the political process must be defined (because how can you understand, regulate and control undefined entities) and must be subject to the will of the people; otherwise it's ridiculous to talk of "people power". The market is neither defined nor does it have any connection whatever with the public good.
Who are the authors of free market capitalism? - THE RICH.
Who are the beneficiaries of free market capitalism? - THE RICH.
Who are the controllers of the economic and political agenda? - THE RICH.
WAKE UP! Democracy and its diabolical twin - free market capitalism - must be abolished. It's time for Meritocracy and social capitalism operating in the public good.
"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution by tomorrow morning." -- Henry Ford
What is the single most important fact for you to grasp about the world? It is that whoever controls the money controls everything else. Therefore a political system such as dumbocracy that gives people the vote but gives them no money and no say over the private individuals, private banks and private corporations that control the money is never anything but the illusion of surrendering power to the people. The ancient controlling elites remain the same as ever. As an act of psychological genius, they gave the people the pretence of power while they maintained iron control of actual power. The only reason they agreed to dumbocracy was that they saw how it would deliver up a servile, compliant, docile population who would delude themselves that they were "free" and in charge, hence would never revolt. Freedumb and dumbocracy are the greatest acts of deception ever devised (apart from Abrahamism, that other masterful con that made billions bow to Satan and call him "God"!). They have fooled the dumb masses in every possible way.
If you want a new world with the people in charge then hear this - dumbocracy must be destroyed and the people must take control of the money. Any other suggestions are bullshit and a supreme waste of time. Without control of the money, the people have nothing and are permanently powerless. The formula for true freedom? - follow the money and seize control of it. There shouldn't be a single private bank run by private individuals serving their own agendas on this planet. Once you realise that, the way forward is simplicity itself, but the elites will of course do all in their power to make you dance to their old tunes and reject any New World Order of authentic people power. The entire debate about economics, politics and freedom is reducible to just a single question - who should control the money; the people or a small group of exceptionally rich private individuals unaccountable to the people yet controlling the people? Everything else is propaganda. So, whose side are you on? It's time to choose.
"It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees." -- Emiliano Zapata
Our world is controlled by a group called the "Ownership Class", or the "Old World Order" - a group of ultra-wealthy individuals and dynastic families of privilege that have always ruled over us, often claiming to reign by "divine right".
The 400 richest Americans have the same wealth as the poorest 150 million Americans. If that statistic doesn’t shock you to the core, you must be one of the 400. The key to understanding our world lies in grasping how 400 individuals, and people like the English Queen, can utterly dominate vast populations that could destroy them in an instant if they so chose. If we lived in the jungle as brute animals, it's inconceivable that the 400 wouldn't be attacked and killed by much stronger individuals. So there is something about human "civilisation" that leads to the astoundingly unnatural situation where 150 million people allow their lives to be destroyed in order that 400 people should live amongst them as monarchs who command all they survey.
“Civilisation” turns out to be a tool to create a pyramidal society where a small, elite class rule over various other layers, with a huge underclass at the bottom, propping up everyone else. The members of the underclass should, logically, attack and kill the elite, but they never do. Why not? – because they buy into the religious and legal prohibitions instilled in them by the elite. They end up fighting amongst themselves and killing each other.
The 400 and their ilk have created an atomised society of self-interested, selfish individuals all ruthlessly and savagely competing with each other according to the mechanistic rules of "game theory". There is no group solidarity. The only common purpose of the 150 million is to screw over everyone else and secure an advantage for themselves. But they do so only amongst their own kind. None of them ever gaze upwards towards the controllers of the game and think, "Hey, why don't I screw THEM over?" They don't think like that because the 400 have created such a power differential between themselves and everyone else that they seem to belong to another world - of gods. They are untouchable. The 150 million fight amongst themselves like rats in a sack, and none of them ever stops to think - "Why are we doing this to each other? Who made us like this? Isn't there a better way?" You need to be smart to have such thoughts, so the elite have designed and promoted a dumbed-down, lowest common denominator culture where everyone is plunging to the bottom rather than rising to the top. How low can you go? - to the uttermost depths of cretinism, vulgarity, tastelessness, crassness, cheapness, and worthlessness. Just turn on your TV and flick through the channels. It's like watching the denizens of Dante's nine circles of hell, except, bizarrely, the damned can't get enough of it. They're glued to their LCD TVs. What they do is make life hell for those who aspire to higher things. The one thing Dante never considered is that hell would be a place that the overwhelming majority LOVE. American Idol and X-Factor - these are programmes created by the elite to provide "bread and circuses" to the masses, and how the masses flock to the Colosseum. What they haven't realised - because they're too stupid - is that they're the "Christians" being fed to the lions. They're watching the annihilation of their hopes of a good life, and yet they're laughing and cheering! That demonstrates the extent of the elite's mind control over them. Every second you spend watching junk TV is a wasted second, and if you watch a huge amount of shit, you've wasted your life.
It’s not enough for the elite 1% to be masters of economic capital (cash and financial assets) alone, and in fact there are three other types of capital which are equally significant: social, cultural and symbolic capital. It was French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu who introduced this extended definition of capital. He said of capital that it applied “to all the goods material and symbolic, without distinction, that present themselves as rare and worthy of being sought after in a particular social formation.”
2) Cultural capital. Think of this as the extent to which you share the cultural values of the elite (they are the ones who shape the cultural values). Do you like what they like? Do you like opera, ballet, classical music, modern art, fine wine, high cuisine, literary fiction, exclusive holidays in luxury resorts where hoi polloi never go? If you want to have a higher status in society, you have to be knowledgeable about the cultural values of the top 1%. If you share their values, they might invite you into their charmed circle. If all you can talk about is "working class" culture, they will regard you as a barbarian and you will never get any invites. "Social climbing" is all about adopting the necessary values to allow you to mix easily with the ruling elite. If you have low economic capital but high cultural capital, you might be able to ascend the social ladder to some extent. If you have low cultural capital but high economic capital, you will always be regarded as "vulgar", as “new money”.
So, cultural capital is about "table manners", the extent to which you can exhibit refined taste (such taste being dictated by the value system of the elite, which is designed to exclude 99% of the people). Bourdieu refers to cultural capital most especially in relation to education. That's the primary arena where you can adopt the values of the elite and gain a higher status for yourself. If you reject education, you are unlikely to acquire any cultural capital. You will be more like Tony Montana in Scarface - an uncouth, violent thug with no class. Most parents are clueless about how to acquire cultural capital, and so their children are equally ignorant. You don't get it by eating junk food, watching TV and playing video games.
Cultural capital – non-financial social nous; knowing what the elite like – can help you with your networking (social capital) and then lead to the acquisition of greater economic capital because you will get a better job than those lacking cultural capital. Understanding cultural capital is the best route to social mobility for anyone outside the privileged elite. Cultural capital opens the doors that would otherwise be locked. But, crucially, it's all about embracing the values of a profoundly elitist and snobbish group who despise ordinary people. Why should you have to play that game in order to get on in the world? And what would it say about you if you did play along?
Think of the importance of the American flag and the Star Spangled Banner anthem to ordinary Americans. Think of the power of the Koran over the collective Muslim mind. Think of Ferrari cars, Rolex watches, designer labels and so on. People crave certain consumer goods not because they have great intrinsic value but because they are priceless in terms of symbolic value. Everyone wants the symbols that impress others. People are obsessed with signs and symbols. We are all judging each other according to the signs and symbols we have on show. These are the basis of STATUS, and underpin the perpetual status war in which we are all engaged. Everyone wants to have the signs and symbols associated with the highest status, so the rich are always the winners in the status war.
*****
In summary, we can think of economic capital as “what you own” (personal wealth), social capital as “who you know” (nepotism, cronyism and privilege), cultural capital as “what you know about the values and tastes of the ruling elite, and how well you are in accord with those values and tastes” and symbolic capital as “the signs and symbols that indicate your status, with the highest and most desirable signs and symbols being those linked to the rich elite.”
Isn’t it time to wake up? Stop swallowing the elite's propaganda. These people are scum and it's time they were swept away by the people's righteous anger, just as they were in the French and Russian Revolutions.
"You understand that in this election, the greatest risk we can take is to try the same old politics with the same old players and expect a different result." -- Barack Obama
What did Obama do when he got into power? He appointed the same old players, tried the same old politics, and got the same old results! That's democracy for you. Only a madman would keep trying the same old failed formula. Democracy is no longer tenable. It's time for meritocracy.
The top 3 million Americans (1%) own 33% of the nation's wealth - 32 times more than their fair share. (Some estimates put it as high as 42%, and growing.)
The bottom 150 million Americans (50%) own 3% of the country's wealth - 16 times less than their fair share.
The next 149 million Americans (49%) own 64% of the country's wealth - 0.3 times more than their fair share.
In other words, 1% are having a ball, 49% are doing slightly better than OK, and 50% are in hell. Where's the Revolution? How can you treat half of your population like shit in order to allow 1% to live like kings? Why do the 50% tolerate it? It's the 49
% who are the accomplices of the elite 1%.
Imagine life as a 100 metres race. 49% of the people are more or less at the starting line, but 1% are 32 metres up the track. Their 100 metres race is only 68 metres long! As for 50%, they are 16 metres behind the starting line. They have to run 16 metres before they even join the race. (Many don't get that far: they never start.) Ask yourself a very simple question - who will win this race and who will lose? Is there any doubt? The race is rigged from the beginning. 1% are sure to win and 50% are sure to lose. As for the 49%, they need to break every world record imaginable to beat the 1%. they have to be one in a million! Do you fancy those odds? So why are you taking part in this race? Isn't it time for a new race where everyone lines up at the same starting line?
Meritocracy is based on the absolute destruction of the rigged race of life via the introduction of 100% inheritance tax i.e. an overwhelming advantage can no longer be passed on by rich parents to their children. All children, no matter the wealth of their parents, must begin at the same starting line as everyone else. No parent can rig the race. The 1% can no longer dictate the outcome of the race.
Many people claim to be meritocrats but when you mention 100% inheritance tax to them, all of the blood drains from their faces. You know what that means? - THEY'RE NOT MERITOCRATS!
"Democracy" literally means "people power" (demos - people; kratos = power). It was designed to stop rule by the rich elite. Look at "democratic" America. Who runs it? The rich elite - the top 1%!!! Why haven't the dumb "democrats" worked out that the elite have conned them yet again!
"There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." -- US billionaire Warren Buffett.
"There's a sucker born every minute." -- P.T. Barnum
Is your name on the "Suckers' List"? Isn't it time you removed it? FIGHT BACK!
Note; the above is purported to be written by an Aritifical Intelligence, ie super computor ? Who knows?