CRAZY IN USA:
Man stabs boss as he's being fired...
TV Reporter Punches Competitor At MLB Game...
Actor busted for bomb threat on AMTRAK...
Owner beats dog to death, uses GOFUNDME for vet bills...
Academics warn college students going off the rails...
TSA Screening SNACKS?
You need to be a member of puredevoteeseva to add comments!
Replies
Colleges are ‘unreformable’ by now
STEUBENVILLE, Ohio – Today’s college students are “situationally confused.” They have no room in their schedules for “intellectual curiosity.”
And their sexual promiscuity is practically the only part of their lives that their colleges refuse to police.
Two veteran academics who have diagnosed different plagues in modern higher education have little optimism for young people entering college for the foreseeable future, judging by their presentations to a conference this past weekend at Franciscan University of Steubenville, a conservative Catholic institution.
College students have no passions today and “aren’t trained to pay attention to the things they feel connected to,” former Yale English professor William Deresiewicz told the gathering on the “crisis” in American higher education at the Veritas Center for Public Ethics.
In fact, higher education has become “profoundly unintellectual” and student life has become about “accumulating gold stars,” said Deresiewicz, who publicly disavowed Ivy League education several years after leaving Yale.
The author of Excellent Sheep, which fleshes out his views on the failure of elite education, told the Franciscan crowd that most students nowadays think that being intellectual simply means getting good grades.
Deresiewicz explained that most students now engross themselves so much into learning the structural parts of their classes that they “don’t have time for intellectual curiosity.”
Students “can’t think for themselves because they don’t have time,” he said.
MORE: Deresiewicz urges students to leave Ivy League, go to public college
He began assigning A-minus grades to students whose papers simply checked all the necessary boxes for an A but didn’t add any real insight, while working with those students to help them find their own intellectual voice.
Deresiewicz recounted how a student once told him “‘I hate all my activities, I hate all my classes, I hated high school, and I expect to hate my job,’” and that she had accepted this as her reality.
Such students go into fields including law, medicine and finance because they assume it will yield a lucrative career, not because they actually have a passion for those disciplines.
“You might as well go to Wall Street and make a lot of money if you have nothing better to do,” he quipped.
MORE: More bureaucracy leads to less critical thinking, says Deresiewicz
The former professor, who taught at Columbia and Yale before becoming a full-time writer in 2008, said “young people aren’t trained to pay attention to the things they feel connected to.” He said most of the students he had taught at Yale came there with a “passion for success” but no other particular goals.
In loco parentis – selectively enforced
A professor who made his name in 2005 by shining a light on the “anarchic and often dangerous sexual environment” on campus, meanwhile, warned that college students’ sexual behaviors are just as degraded as their intellectual undertakings.
Vigen Guroian, professor of religious studies in Orthodox Christianity at the University of Virginia, focused on the implications of “sexual libertinism” on college campuses in his talk.
His Christianity Today article “Dorm Brothel” launched a wave of attention for the professor, then teaching at Loyola College in Maryland. Readers flooded Guroian’s inbox with stories of their experiences with the collegiate sexual free-for-all.
Guroian said he wasn’t trying to shame Loyola into changing its policies on sexual activity by writing the article. He simply wanted to lament the destruction of courtship and marriage that those widespread sexual behaviors were causing.
“I believe that the college experience has an impact on the marriages our children make” and has probably affected the divorce rate, he said.
MORE: UT-Knoxville teaches women how to penetrate men
But rules were definitely on Guroian’s mind. He talked about his own experience living at a fraternity house as a UVA undergraduate, and the role that an institution has in policing its students’ behavior: “Whoever tells you that colleges aren’t practicing ‘in loco parentis’ is lying to you.”
But colleges only act in the place of a parent selectively, Guroian said: If colleges are policing alcohol and drug use, why aren’t they policing where and when students are in situations where they can behave promiscuously?
Historically, college has been where people often find their spouse, but “dating has taken a back seat,” Guroian said. “Where courtship languishes, marriage weakens.”
MORE: Why I fight for sexual purity at Georgetown
Guroian said the university preemptively hired psychologists and lawyers to defend itself from precisely the sort of allegations that would later form the basis of that story – that UVA turned a blind eye to a brutal gang rape in a fraternity house.
It wouldn’t matter if the accusation were true or not, he said: The university nonetheless was prepared to issue a swift and effective response, the essence of which would be “someone or something other than the university was to blame.”
Guroian also lamented the end of single-sex colleges as a “great tragedy,” claiming that many problems seen today would not exist if even just dormitories were single-sex. When he was a student in the 1970s, “no one thought unisex dorms was possible.”
He believes colleges are “unreformable,” and that any attempt at reining in the problem of sexual libertinism will only cause more problems. Guroian said he’s “dreading the idea” of his grandchildren reaching college age.
MORE: Dozens of students pose nearly nude for college paper
IMAGES: Leszek Glasner/Shutterstock, Yale NUS College, Guroian.com
Screening Snacks May Be Part Of Stricter Airport Security
By Kathy Walsh
DENVER (CBS4) – Be prepared to pull out your pretzels or show your sandwich when you go through security at Denver International Airport.
(credit: CBS)
These days, snacks and other items may be part of screening at airports across the country.
There are no changes to what you’re allowed to carry on, but the screening at security has become stricter.
(credit: CBS)
It used to be just laptops had to be in a separate bin and then x-rayed. But recently, the Transportation Security Administration required screening for all electronics larger than a cell phone.
There has also been a focus on other items, including food.
“I think that screening snacks seems a little pointless,” said one traveler at DIA.
(credit: CBS)
But in Colorado and across the country, TSA officers may suggest passengers remove select items, such as snacks, from their carry-on bags.
(credit: CBS)
“I don’t really know what they would be looking for,” said a woman heading for the security checkpoint. “You’re just going to be putting a lot more in bins and causing more traffic. I think it would be a lot slower.”
(credit: CBS)
But according to TSA, de-cluttering carry-on bags could facilitate the screening process and help obtain clearer x-ray images.
“I don’t mind putting anything in the bin so they can see what it is and verify that it’s okay,” said Lori Heniser.
Heniser and her husband, Larry, both of Castle Rock, are happy to display their snacks.
“Whatever it takes to keep us safe,” said Larry Heniser.
(credit: CBS)
TSA makes it clear there is no policy requiring travelers to remove food, but officers at any airport can make the request. TSA says the goal is to screen passengers as quickly and efficiently as possible.
The stronger security measures do not apply to passengers enrolled in TSA PreCheck who are using TSA PreCheck lanes.
Kathy Walsh is CBS4’s Weekend Anchor and Health Specialist. She has been with CBS4 since 1984. She is always open to story ideas. Follow Kathy on Twitter @WalshCBS4.