Drones Shot Down Over Texas
Surveillance drones blasted out of the sky in protest against 4th amendment intrusion
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Following columnist Charles Krauthammer’s observation that the first person to shoot down a surveillance drone on U.S. soil will be a “folk hero,” gun enthusiasts in Texas have done precisely that as a protest against the use of spy drones on the American people.
Using consumer drones as target practice, Alex Jones and the Steiner brothers tested out the best way to bring down the drones on the 10,000 acre Steiner ranch as part of filming for Brothers in Arms, a new show which focuses on firearms and the second amendment.
With spy drones now commercially available for less than $1,000 dollars that are barely any different from the ones being used by police departments to spy on the public, Jones and the Steiners made short work of the devices during filming.
This was an exercise in pushing the message that the use of surveillance drones in U.S. skies must be politically shot down because it represents a complete violation of the 4th amendment right to privacy.
Congress recently passed legislation paving the way for what the FAA predicts will be somewhere in the region of 30,000 drones in operation in US skies by 2020.
Privacy advocates have warned that the FAA has not acted to establish any safeguards whatsoever, and that lawmakers are not holding the agency to account.
In addition, a recently uncovered Air Force document circumvents laws and clears the way for the Pentagon to use drones to monitor the activities of Americans.
Incidents involving the drones in recent months have hardly provided positive spin for the industry, which is why Americans are set to witness a massive PR campaign that will “bombard the American public with positive images and messages about drones in an effort to reverse the growing perception of the aircraft as a threat to privacy and safety.”
Earlier this month, a mystery object, thought to be a military or law enforcement drone, flying in controlled airspace over Denver almost caused a catastrophic mid air crash with a commercial jet.
Last summer, police in North Dakota used a Predator drone to spy on a family who refused to give back three cows and their calves that wandered onto their 3,000-acre farm.
Watch out for the next episode in which you’ll see a full size drone blasted out of the sky. Watch the first installment of Brothers in Arms below.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Replies
17-Year-Old Girl Included On Obama’s Secret ‘Kill List’
Americans target of state-sponsored assassination program
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
President Barack Obama’s unconstitutional secret ‘kill list’ includes a 17-year-old girl along with several American citizens, according to a New York Times report.
“Mr. Obama has placed himself at the helm of a top secret “nominations” process to designate terrorists for kill or capture, of which the capture part has become largely theoretical. He had vowed to align the fight against Al Qaeda with American values; the chart, introducing people whose deaths he might soon be asked to order, underscored just what a moral and legal conundrum this could be,” reports the NY Times, adding that one of the targets in Yemen is “a girl who looked even younger than her 17 years,” and that “Several were Americans.”
The White House has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to provide any evidence or go through any legal process. The administration merely has to state that the target is a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.
In December, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing for state sponsored assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any legal protection against being marked for summary execution.
During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism without trial on a case by case basis.
“So it’s the requirement of the administration under the current legal understanding that the president has to make that declaration, not you?” Panetta was asked, to which he replied, “That is correct.”
The fact that the administration is carrying out state-sponsored assassination with absolutely no regard to legal due process in the name of fighting Al-Qaeda is particularly brazen given the fact that the US has backed Al-Qaeda terrorists in both Libya and Syria in the effort to overthrow Colonel Gaddafi and Bashar Al-Assad.
“In the USA, it is illegal to impose executions on people under 18, something that most Democrats would support, I suppose. Yet, their vaunted president, Barack Obama, has declared that a 17-year-old girl is to be gunned down if American spies can find her,” writes Bill Anderson.
“Somehow, I doubt that there will be a peep of protest about that at the Democratic National Convention this summer. And, to make things even more depressing, I’m sure that the Republicans will claim that Obama is “soft on terrorism” and is too “timid” to launch the U.S. Killing Machine in full force. So it has come to this: Washington, D.C., is the new home of Murder, Inc.”
Given that spy drones used to hunt down insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq are now not only being deployed domestically but also armed with non-lethal weapons, how long before such technology is used to assassinate American citizens on U.S. soil based on the mere claim that the target is a terrorist?
*********************
Democrats, Republicans criticize leaks, not drone murders
By Patrick Martin
9 June 2012
At an extraordinary press conference Thursday, the top Democrats and Republicans on the House and Senate intelligence committees denounced leaks to the press about US drone missile attacks and other covert actions. They objected, not to the violations of international law being carried out by the Obama administration, but to media reports making these violations known to the American people.
The bipartisan backing for censorship and cover-up followed a closed-door briefing for selected senators and congressmen by James R. Clapper, the director of national intelligence, and Robert S. Mueller, director of the FBI. The briefing reportedly focused on several recent leak-based stories in the major US media:
* A May 9 report in the Associated Press, the Wall Street Journal and other publications that a US double agent in Yemen had exposed and disrupted Al Qaeda plans to bomb targets in the United States
* A May 16 report in the Washington Post about the Obama administration sanctioning secret arms transfers to the Syrian rebels and providing them military training
* A May 29 report in the New York Times detailing President Obama’s personal role in approving a “kill list” of targets for US drone missile strikes
* A May 29 report in Newsweek magazine, excerpting more details about the drone missile attacks reported in a book by Newsweek staffer Daniel Klaidman
* A June 1 report in the New York Times confirming the US-Israeli collaboration in devising the Stuxnet worm and introducing it into the computer systems of Iran’s nuclear program, causing considerable damage
These press reports cited as sources top US intelligence and military officials, as well as White House aides, all speaking anonymously, all presenting these covert operations as successful efforts by the Obama administration to target the enemies of American imperialism.
The four legislators who held the press conference Thursday were Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Diane Feinstein, a Democrat; the Republican vice-chairman, Saxby Chambliss; Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Mike Rogers, a Republican; and the ranking Democrat on the committee, C. A. Ruppersberger.
A joint statement issued by the four on Wednesday declared, “In recent weeks, we have become increasingly concerned at the continued leaks regarding sensitive intelligence programs and activities including specific details of sources and methods… The accelerating pace of such disclosures, the sensitivity of the matters in question, and the harm caused to our national security interests is alarming and unacceptable.”
All four reiterated this position at their joint press conference Thursday, denouncing the leaks as a threat to US national security, while endorsing the operations detailed in those leaks, which constitute a series of criminal acts of war under international law.
The US operations against Syria and Iran are both brazen acts of international aggression, while the use of drone-fired missiles to assassinate targeted individuals as well as groups of unidentified but “suspected” terrorists is nothing short of murder.
The description in the New York Times of the White House decision-making process in selecting targets for drone attacks could be entered as evidence in a future war crimes tribunal. According to the Times account, Obama has established the principle that any military-age male in a target zone may be killed as a presumed terrorist, regardless of his actual status. Such deliberate and indiscriminate targeting of civilians is a flagrant violation of the Geneva Conventions.
The remarks of the senators and congressmen, Democrats and Republicans alike, focused on the damage that these news report had done to ongoing US covert operations—including, no doubt, murderous activities that these four plugged-in officials know about but which have not yet been made public.
The Democrats were vociferous. Feinstein declared, referring to the leaks, “This has to stop.” Ruppersberger said, “This is one of the most serious breaches in the last couple articles that have come out that I have seen. It puts us at risk. It puts lives at risk.”
The operations detailed in these press reports have caused the deaths of hundreds if not thousands of innocent people in Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, Afghanistan and other countries. But that is not what concerns the Democratic and Republican officials.
The joint statement instead warned, “Each disclosure puts American lives at risk, makes it more difficult to recruit assets, strains the trust of our partners, and threatens imminent and irreparable damage to our national security in the face of urgent and rapidly adapting threats worldwide.”
Despite the fulminations on Capitol Hill, the news reports of the past few weeks hardly amount to an exposure of US covert operations. Most of the articles are written in an entirely supportive, even fawning, tone, and give details that present the US government and its most murderous agencies in an entirely favorable light. Moreover, those details could only have been provided by intelligence and military operatives and close personal aides of Obama, who were the driving force of the press revelations.
This reality has led sections of the Republican Party to complain that Obama is using the CIA and military actions to boost his reelection campaign—a charge that is certainly true, since the media barrage began with the White House celebration of the first anniversary of the Navy Seals raid that killed Osama bin Laden on May 2.
One prominent Democrat, Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, denied that “the public had to know” about the Stuxnet software virus, despite admitting that it was a “fundamental national security issue.” He came close to characterizing the Times’ report as treasonous, saying, “I don’t see how the public interest is well served by it. I do see how other interests outside the United States are well served by it.”
The response of the Times to such bullying was to grovel. Managing Editor Dean Baquet issued a statement Wednesday defending publication of the Stuxnet story, and revealing the role of the newspaper as a virtual organ of the intelligence apparatus. “As always with sensitive stories,” he wrote, “we described the piece to the government before publication. No one suggested we not publish.”
The two Democrats and two Republicans on the intelligence committees called on the Obama administration to crack down on unauthorized leaks, saying, they intend to “press the executive branch to take tangible and demonstrable steps to detect and deter intelligence leaks, and to fully, fairly, and impartially investigate the disclosures that have taken place.”
They are knocking on an open door, since the Obama administration has already launched more investigations and prosecutions of supposed leakers than all previous US governments combined.
The most notorious and reactionary case is the persecution of Army Private Bradley Manning, accused of supplying the WikiLeaks web site with after-action reports and gun-camera footage documenting American war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables detailing the machinations of US imperialism around the world. A military judge was scheduled to rule Friday on defense motions to dismiss 10 of the 22 charges against Manning.