One Moviegoer With a Gun Could Have Prevented 70 Innocent People From Being Shot

  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

Mac Slavo
SHTFPlan.com
July 21, 2012

In light of the incident at the Dark Knight premier, it’s worth noting that we as a law abiding society could have prevented the deaths of, at last count, 13 people and the injuries sustained by scores of others.

Anti-gun fanatics will tell us that outlawing guns is the solution. In fact, before the smoke from the gunfire dissipated this morning special interests and politicians werealready calling for more gun control. Mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg has asked our Presidential candidates to directly address the issue:

No matter where you stand on the Second Amendment, no matter where you stand on guns, we have a right to hear from both of them, concretely, not just in generalities, specifically, what are they going to do about guns?

No doubt Mr. Bloomberg (and his merry band of government nitwits) would be ecstatic if both candidates supported a Constitutional Convention to eliminate the second amendment.

While Messers Obama and Romney will likely treat us to a host of platitudes regarding the issue, the fact of the matter is that prevention of such horrendous crimes falls not in the hands of the government, but of the people.

Take, for example, the recent actions of a Florida man who spotted two armed robbers enter the internet cafe that he was patronizing. He just so happened to be a card carrying member of the personal responsibility club and had his weapon strapped to his belt.

The two robbers burst through the doors of the Palms Internet Cafe in Ocala and ordered everyone to get down as they waved a handgun at dozens of customers.

But they didn’t expect Samuel Williams to pull out his own weapon and fire…

Via The Daily Crux

When these thugs started waving their guns around and ordering people to the floor, Samuel Williams didn’t hesitate. He drew his weapon and opened fire. He may have saved dozens of lives by his actions.

Video courtesy of Sherrie Questioning All:

A witness summarizes how Williams took care of business:

This guy kept poppin’. He didn’t stop. He just kept poppin’… I think he shot both of them.

Seconds counted; the police were minutes away; Mr. Williams, not knowing what the intentions of the armed robbers were, took action.

Lives were saved, the armed robbers were wounded (unfortunately), arrested and subsequently released on bail (because that’s how government “prevents” violent crime).

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

The other ‘preventative’ measure put forth by a government that wants to ensure they and they alone have the right to impose their will by way of the gun would be to strip the rest of us of our right to defend ourselves. In a few days they may do just that when President Obama and Secretary Clinton join the United Nations in their never ending battle to restrict private ownership.

But, as we’ve seen countless times – in the UK, Washington D.C., and most notably in Chicago, Illinois – when you ban guns, violent crimes (gun crimes in many cases!) actually increase. Crime has gotten so bad in Chicago that we can’t even call it crime anymore. As the police gang unit in the city described it, it’s a war zone not dissimilar to what soldiers see in Iraq and Afghanistan.

At the risk of beating a dead horse, we’ll repeat the adage that when private law abiding citizens are banned from owning guns and defending themselves, only criminals will have the guns. And they will use them to indiscriminately murder innocent men, women and children.

Mayor Bloomberg wants to know what we are going to do about guns?

How will we prevent another Dark Knight rampage, or Columbine massacre or Luby’s incident?

The answer is to allow American citizens to arm themselves. An armed society is a peaceful and respectful society.

And when you get that small percentage of people who truly have mental disorders, who don’t care about killing others or dying themselves, there is nothing – not a gun ban or a liberal group hug that’s going to stop them.

Such an action as was committed by the psychopath in a movie theater today can be dealt with in just one fashion: DEADLY FORCE.

The talking heads and politicians will analyze the gunman’s motives. Psychologist and doctors will explain to us how we need to find the troublesome people before they strike. Anti-gun advocates will cite statistics and organize protests.

Here’s the reality of it.

This is America. We have laws that allow Americans to own guns, so you’re just not going to get them off the streets. We can’t simply arrest people for pre-crime if we suspect them of having a mental condition, because as we know, the government now classifies millions of us as domestic terrorists and just plain nuts, so that option is akin to shipping us all off to re-education camps or worse.

There is only one way to lower the violent crime rate and put the power back into the hands of peaceful people who intend to live their lives to the fullest and in a manner consistent with the rule of law.

It’s simple, really.

One moviegoer with a gun could have prevented 70 innocent people from being shot today.


  1. Hundreds of innocent people wrongly spied on by police
  2. Myths and Reality About People Who Carry Concealed Weapons
  3. Right to private life ‘at risk’ in plan to store DNA of innocent people
  4. California Storing DNA of Innocent People
  5. Innocent bystander shot by Anaheim cop for ‘holding broom handle’
  6. MI5 admits to wrongful surveillance of innocent people
  7. FBI Terror Plot: How the Government Is Destroying the Lives of Innocent People
  8. How long does it take a cop to kill an innocent man? 8 seconds
  9. Court: British Government Must Delete Data of Innocent People from DNA Database
  10. Cameraman Shot for Filming Cops in Oakland
  11. People Who Get a Seasonal Flu Shot Are Twice as Likely to Catch Swine Flu
  12. One-third of people shot by Taser need medical attention

    Tamohara dasa said; 70 people shot in a movie theatre in USA. Looks like a psy-op by CIA to me. If one of the movie goers had been carrying a personal firearm, this would not have occurred. In areas where everyone has a gun, crime rates are the lowest and break-ins to homes do not occurr, as the bad guys know they will be shot. 260 millions people have been executed by the illuminati regimes after gun confiscations!

    The news etc has been cooked and manipulated to make guns sound bad, as the UN intends to use foreign troops to confiscate guns from citizens in the USA soon, so that they , the NWO, will be the only ones with weapons. There will be civil war. My father and brothers fought WW2 to stop this from happening. Now, the fight has been passed on to us. I have been resisting this since i was a teenager, then took to Krsna consciousness as the only solution. Now the NWO has taken over Iskcon after murdering our guru maharajah.  This fight is to the death. We must not be stopped from our programs, or Krsna consciousness may fade away..

You need to be a member of puredevoteeseva to add comments!

Join puredevoteeseva

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • One of law enforcements biggest concerns in the United States at the moment is the “Lone Wolf” terrorist, which comes with hype.

    By Shepard Ambellas
    theintelhub.com
    July 21, 2012

    A chilling new video has surfaced on the internet at an opportune time for the establishment to push for total gun confiscation via congress and possibly through a new UN treaty.

    The fact that the video is calling for “domestic terror” attacks within the United States borders is uncanny, and almost to unbelievable. The logic shows a possible PSYOP (psychological operation) in the works or staged terror plot.

    In fact on May 17, 2012 a terrorist warning was issued by the FBI mentioning that theatre wou.... The very same rhetoric we saw during 9/11 when later is was found that Bush had prior knowledge that “Al Qaeda is Determined to Attack in the US”.

    New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg was quoted saying;

    “Weak gun laws are not just a crime problem, they are a national security threat. Congress should take common sense steps to keep guns away from terrorists”.

     

    Read more @ theintelhub.com/2012/07/21/lone-wolf-domestic-terror-rhetoric-used-...

    Published on Jul 20, 2012 by IranContraScumDid911

    This is all about attacking the Second Amendment, if they get rid of your guns the final check and balance against a despotic government is gone. Our founding fathers said the right to bear arms, uninfringed by government, was necessary for a free state. Obama swore to protect the laws that define America, the right to bear arms being one of them. Dont expect Barry to keep his word, he does not believe in the Constitution that he swore to protect and uphold. As soon as I saw Mike Bloomturd jumping on this I knew it was a staged fake White House scam to attack American's rights and the law. The theatre was filled with smoke and actors, according to past staged false flag events like this. This is another staged shooting by the Loughner crew. The White House is the greatest benefactor of mass fear, it reinforces the policies they lay out in advance, that the people would not accept prior to being terrorized.

  • ... you'll see that gov'ts kill more people than citizens "with guns". In fact, pharmaceuticals kill more people than guns!!  And all of the proponents of gun control never ever answer the big question, which is that criminals can get guns without going to gun shops or getting permits, so gun laws don't do sh-- to protect anyone.

    Uttamasloka Prabhu

  • profile | More stories
    Get My BIN Email Newsletter
    Story Views

    Now: 10
    Last Hour: 139
    Last 24 Hours: 922
    Total: 922
    2nd Colorado Suspect: Indian Male - Where Have We Heard This Before?
    July-21-12 4:47
    100% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
    Share0
    3
    Advertisement
    <a href='http://opx.beforeitsnews.com/delivery/ck.php?n=aa00448f&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://opx.beforeitsnews.com/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=20&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=aa00448f' border='0' alt='' /></a>

    The original reports coming out of the horrific shooting in Colorado have stated that an "Indian male" was considered the 2nd suspect in this massacre. This report was quickly squelched. This isn't the first time that a 'terror suspect' has been accompanied by an 'Indian male' as the video at the bottom of the story clearly shows us. In that video, shoe-bombing witness Kurt Haskell testifies to CNN that a "well dressed Indian man" accompanied the so-called "shoe-bomber" aboard the Detroit bound flight back in 2009.

    Story below from International Business Times.:

    Police are searching a local mall for an Indian male suspected of the shooting rampage that killed at least 10 people and injured 20 at a..., near Denver, during a midnight showing of new Batman film The Dark Knight Rises, according to the police radio.

    Multiple children are among the dead according to Donna Hayes-Johnson, a news producer at WFHP. It is even being reported that a baby was shot at point-blanki range.

    Local media report that two gunmen went on the rampage, both wearing gas masks. One of the gunmen is now in custody, and police are searching for the other.

    Read more: www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/365162/20120720/aurora-dark-knight-rises...

    Published on Jul 21, 2012 by N0LINKNEWS

    Second accomplice in tragic Batman Denver Shooting Eyewitness Account opened Emergency door and let shooter in after receiving a phone call.

    Witnesses confirm that James Eagan Holmes was let into the theater by a 2nd accomplice and claim a 2nd smoke grenade was thrown from the back of the theater.
    Colorado Theater Shooter had accomplices! Witness statement to CNN!
    According to a strong witness who was sitting near the shooter, the shooter received a call, went to an emergency door and gestured to someone to come close. Minutes before the shooting, the movie was shut off and the theater was left in complete darkness. The shooter was an unemployed medical student who had military grade gear including body armor, explosives and other weaponry commonly used by SWAT officers. This gear nears $20,000 and most of it is not available to civilians. So even if he could afford it, he would not qualify to legally obtain it, as the media has stated that it was purchased legally. His home was rigged with a maze of explosives that will take days to disarm. The explosives expert for local police stated that it is not like anything he has ever seen in his career. The sophistication is beyond civilian and law enforcement means.
    tinyurl.com/d4v399s

    Uploaded by The1776Liberty on Dec 28, 2009

    www.infowars.com/

    CNN Airs Witness Testimony that 'Well Dressed' Indian accomplice helped Abdulmutallab board
    without passport and that man on plane filmed entire flight and bombing attempt

    Evidence is emerging that clearly indicates Abdulmutallab was able to board only with the help of an unidentified well dressed man seen at the boarding gate.

    Kurt Haskell and his wife, who were witnesses on board Northwest Airlines Flight 253 saw Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab at the boarding gate in Amsterdam. Haskell told CNN that the accused bomber appeared strikingly 'poor' next to the well-dressed man he said was obviously wealthy and appeared to be of Indian ethnicity. According to Haskell, that man did the talking for him, explaining to the flight personnel at the gate that Abdulmutallab needed to board without a passport, claiming that he was a Sudanese refugee.

    The gate attendee referred the odd-couple to the manager. Haskell said that was the last he saw of the wealthy man, but later recognized Abdulmutallab after the incident occurred on the plane. That's when he says he put two and two together about the unusual connection.

    His wife found it 'odd' that authorities have not yet followed up on their witness account, as they were the only ones known to have witnessed Abdulmutallab with the 'Indian' man prior to boarding the flight.

    If he had help getting on the flight with no passport after having been reported to the authorities by his own father, what is the true explanation for the man seen filming the entire flight? Another witness on board the flight, Richelle Keepman, said she noticed the cameraman at the beginning of the flight, believing the man might have been simply excited about a first flight, or etc. Later when the 'bombing' incident took place, she says the cameraman was the only one standing up, and intently filming the entire incident.

    Put this together with the coinciding announcement that Yemen 'is the next front in the fight against Al Qaeda', the media's immediate hype of the event, and the ready-made Body Scanners and other 'enhanced' Airport security, it is clear that this is a contrived incident intentionally unleashed to goad renewed support for ever-expanding terrorism-related warfare in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan, prepatory talks about Iran, and now Yemen.

    Just like after 9/11, airport travellers are again prepared to accept greater violations of their liberties and privacy for supposed security. Yet patsies and watchlist-subjects alike have repeatedly been allowed to bypass security clearance and been proven to have ties to the intelligence community.

    The latest accused 'terrorist' Abdulmutallab was very likely the fallguy in a pattern-drill-- handled by wealthy, mismatched associates, allowed to board without required credentials, and videotaped by a cameraman with an unknown connection. Was Abdulmutallab involved with these figures through a drill which ended with an intentionally-failed bombing meant to incite great fear of terrorism?

    This would fit closely with other elements of CIA-concocted "terrorism." Many of the 9/11 hijackers and other known extremists were revealed to have participated in 'dry run' drills, shared addresses with intelligence handlers or lived on military bases, were allowed to pass through the border despite being on one or more watchlists, and were given VISAS/Passports through execptions and/or special clearance.

    Similarly, David Headly, named in the Mumbai attack, has been exposed as a CIA-double agent. www.prisonplanet.com/terrorist-or-cia-agent-maybe-both.html

    FBI/CIA provocateurs and exaggerated accounts of extremists groups have continued to emerge from the phony stories given to the public in the cases of many would-be plots, such as in Toronto, 'plot' to bomb the Sears Tower, the Transatlantic liquid bomb plot, alleged plans to 'blow up a Jewish temple and shoot down military planes' in New York and more.
    www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/080606militaryconnections.htm
    www.prisonplanet.com/new-york-terror-plot-another-government-provoc...
    www.prisonplanet.com/cia-and-mi6-links-to-rauf-and-liquid-bomb-plot...
    www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/230606searstower.htm

    We see a similar pattern here, the emerging evidence strongly suggests. How long will we allow deliberately-provoked terror incidents to frighten us to death, invade our privacy, erode our liberties, restrict our travel and perpetuate an ever-expanding string of wars?

    Benjamin Franklin long ago warned us that "If we restrict liberty to attain security, we will lose both." And that those willing to make that bargain deserve neither their liberty nor security.

  • Red Alert: U.N. Small Arms Treaty Aims to Eventually Ban the 2nd Amendment

    MPS-eFoods-Custom-468x60.jpg

    By Alex Thomas
    theintelhub.com
    July 16, 2012

    The United Nations is currently attempting to pass a large scale small arms treaty that many believe would lead to an attempt on an eventual ban of the 2nd amendment.

    A report published on Forbes by Larry Bell has gone ultra viral, with many finally coming to the conclusion that, despite attempts by liberal and Obama shills to downplay the treaty, it is actually a grave threat to our right to bare arms.

    On June 29, 130 Republican House members sent a letter to President Obama and Secretary Clinton arguing that the proposed treaty infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”.

    The letter charges that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.” The lawmakers adamantly insist that the U.S. Government has no right to support a treaty that violates the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

    {….}

    But, like LOST, the Arms Trade Treaty can’t be enacted unless Congress ratifies it. Right? And, of course, they would never approve any global agreement that will infringe upon our constitutional Second Amendment protections. Right? Well, let’s assume for argument’s sake that they won’t. But now consider another possibility, something called a “soft law”.

    Remember that sustainable development agenda mentioned earlier that the European foreign ministers want to incorporate into the treaty provisions? Originally intended to be implemented in connection with a U.N. treaty, an “Agenda 21” plan was enacted as a soft law in 1993 creating a nongovernmental organization, the “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives” (ICLEI), by Executive Order after the Clinton administration was unsuccessful in getting Congress to ratify the program. They wouldn’t approve the treaty because it would transfer massive regulatory control over broad aspects of U.S. energy production and consumption.

    In 2003 the NGO’s name was changed to “ICLEI- Local Governments for Sustainability” to emphasize “local” and diminish concerns about “international” influence and associations with U.N. political and financial ties. ICLEI’s are now active in most of our counties On its web page, “ICLEI: Connecting Leaders”, the organization explains that their networking strategy connects cities and local governments to the United Nations and other international bodies.

    Agenda 21 envisions a global scheme for healthcare, education, nutrition, agriculture, labor, production, and consumption. A summary version titled AGENDA 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet (Earthpress, 1993), calls for “…a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced—a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The report emphasizes that “This shift will demand a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.”

    ICLEI’s web page states that its Local Agenda 21 [LA21] Model Communities Programme is “designed to aid local governments in implementing Chapter 28 of Agenda 21, the global action plan for sustainable development.”

    As Gary Lawrence, a planner for the city of Seattle and an advisor to the Clinton-Gore administration’s Council on Sustainable Development and to U.S. AID commented at a 1998 U.N. Environmental Development Forum in London titled “The Future of Local Agenda 21 in the New Millennium”, “In some cases, LA21 is seen as an attack on the power of the nation-state.” He went on to say, “Participating in a U.N. advocated planning process will very likely bring out many…who would work to defeat any elected official…undertaking Local Agenda 21 …So we will call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.”

    And so they have. “Comprehensive planning”, “growth management” and “smart growth” (which is Agenda 21 with a new name). All mean pretty much the same thing… centralized control over virtually every aspect of urban life: energy and water use, housing stock and allocation, population levels, public health and dietary regimens, resources and recycling, “social justice” and education.

    So this time the U.N.-sponsored ATT initiative, whether enacted by Congress or through a soft law Executive Order, can be expected to receive an appealing identity as well. Most likely it will purport to protect us from “terrorism”, “insurgency” and/or “international crime syndicates”.

    Perhaps, without saying so, it will be pitched to protect us even from ourselves.

    Aaron Dykes of Infowars.com also published a lengthy and detailed report on the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which conclusively proves that the treaty is about eventually gutting the 2nd amendment.

    The report also connects the Fast and Furious gun running operation with globalist gun grabbers attempts to disarm the American people.

    Regardless whether or not a treaty can 100% supersede the Constitution, the fact remains that the United Nations and the many traitors in the US government simply do not care, and will do everything in their power to enforce it.

    The people of this once great country are now in grave danger of either being disarmed or falling victim to sophisticated military weapons, troops, and drones if they refuse to turn in their guns.

    Sadly, we cannot just claim that it is up to the people of their state to make sure this does not happen when the reality is they could care less what we think or say, this treaty is a major piece of the new world orders continued plans for world domination and sending your politician faxes isn’t going to change that.


    0402_MPS_Blaze_FoodSecurity.jpg

    <SCRIPT language='JavaScript1.1' SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N7384.1048585.THEINTELHUB.COM/B6812891;abr=!ie;sz=300x250;ord=[timestamp]?"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N7384.1048585.THEINTELHUB.COM/B6812891;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=[timestamp]?"> <IMG SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N7384.1048585.THEINTELHUB.COM/B6812891;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=[timestamp]?" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 ALT="Advertisement"></A> </NOSCRIPT>

    Comments

    36 Responses to “Red Alert: U.N. Small Arms Treaty Aims to Eventually Ban the 2nd Amendment”

    1. Welby says:

      By Osama/Obama signing this UN Treaty, it allows the UN, Nato & Foreign troops to enter America to enforce this “treaty”. You don’t suppose by these foreign troops coming here would trigger any violence do you? Naw, not here, we’re the freest country on earth……Right?

    2. BigBarrels says:

      LITTLE SCARED DESPERATE BITCHES TAKE DRASTIC MEASURES.

    3. Mr. Mojo says:

      “Truth and a firearm is more effective than truth alone.”

    4. antiglobalist says:

      I will give them my guns and ammo. one bullet at a time!

This reply was deleted.