Recognize, Learn and Understand Agenda 21 in Your Town

Posted by Tamohara dasa ADMIN. on June 17, 2012 at 1:42 in News and World Events

Recognize, Learn and Understand Agenda 21 in Your Town

Susanne Posel

Occupy Corporatism

March 13, 2012

Agenda 21 is the United Nations attempt to control the world. And they are doing a very good job so far. More than 178 nations adopted Agenda 21 as official policy during a signing ceremony at the Earth Summit. Their means are stealthy and hidden under cloaks of environmental sustainability, city planning, and policies that promise to make each city in America more efficient. George H.W. Bush originally signed onto Agenda 21 on behalf of the US.

Executive Order #12858, signed by Bill Clinton in 1995, created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development with the goal to “harmonize” the US environmental policy with UN directives. This action effectively put the US under the control of the United Nations. This also forced all Federal Government agencies to join with state and local governments to come into line with Agenda 21 policies.

ICLEI: Local Governments for Sustainability is a UN agency that provides “local” community plans, software and training to towns and cities that pay their dues. Other private organizations in league with ICLEI are:

National League of Cities
International City/County Management Group
National Governors Association
American Planning Group

The Agenda 21 goal is to control development and population through the guise of Sustainable Development. But do not be fooled. The purveyors of this agenda have a more sinister objective in mind. And they have infiltrated nearly all the towns and cities in America to have their aims come to fruition.

To recognize these masked agendas, pay attention to these red flags.

Sustainable Development is defined as the integration of economic, social and environmental policies to ensure a reduction in consumption, social equity and preservation of biodiversity. Some examples are:

Smart Growth
Wildlands Project
Resilient Cities
Regional Visioning Projects or Local Visioning
STAR Sustainable Communities
Green Jobs/Building Codes or “Going Green”

Their actual plans are to focus on the global impact of use of land, education and depopulation through control measures. Through the elimination of personal property rights, private education (including homeschooled children) and eugenics (forced sterility), the globalization of the planet can be achieved.

The term Sustainable Development appeared in the pages a 1987 report Our Common Future produced by the United Nations World Commission on Environmental and Development. Gro Harlem Brundtland, VP of the World Socialist Party, authored the document. In 1992, a document called UN Sustainable Development Agenda 21, issued at the UN’s Earth Summit.

Since 2008 there has been an obvious redistribution of wealth in America. This fits in with Agenda21’s ideal of social justice. Private property is an offence to social justice because it cannot be used by everyone if it is owned by a single person. This is a very big no-no to the United Nations. Along these lines, the idea of nationalism (defined as patriotism) is an affront to a global society where all humans are citizens in league for the One World Government. Included in this ideal is one world healthcare. Choice and freedom do not fit in with this plan.

Because businesses can breathe economic life into a community, the small business must not be allowed to thrive. We have seen the takeover of the “mom and pop” shops by the big box stores (Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot, etc …) and this is an evidence of Agenda 21. Where a One World Corporate body provides all the needs to the populace, there is no need for free enterprise. This American tradition is slowly being edged out. The effects are the population’s dependence on the mega-corporations for their daily needs.

America 2050 is an organization sponsored by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, lists 11 megaregions in the United States and Canada. A megaregion is typically defined as a chain of roughly adjacent metropolitan areas. The concept is based on the original Megalopolis model.

Environmental systems and topography
Infrastructure systems
Economic linkages
Settlement patterns and land use
Shared culture and history

The need for megaregions is because the US will be reduced to 11 regions that will be habitable for humans by the UN’s design. These mega-cities will be connected through railways. The general public’s access to free movement across megaregions will be severely restricted. Trains will also be used to transport the food and supplies to these areas.

Currently, federal government agencies are working with corporations like Amtrak, the housing and urban development authorizations and farm policies to connect and restrict the needs of the cities. A high speed rail system is needed to meet the growing movement across the country. This provides freight systems to move directly to ports, pick up their goods and transport them. Truck Only Tolls are designed to discourage individual movement of goods. The need for traditional truck driving will be a distant memory. Trains are more easily controlled by the governing agencies in charge of managing the population of these areas.

This short film is being shown to students in Secondary schools in Britain. It outlines what life will be like under Agenda 21 and the UN control. Its function is to make light of the reality of a completely controlled existence. The film’s use as propaganda designed to ready the younger generations to how their life will be is a terrifying possibility we all can work to stopping now. Before it is too late.

11:32 Agenda 21: The End of Private Property Has Begun... (Ep 9)by patriotupdatereportFeatured Video21,360 views

You need to be a member of puredevoteeseva to add comments!

Join puredevoteeseva

★

Votes: 0

Email me when people reply –

Replies

Tamohara dasa ADMIN. June 17, 2012 2:08
Top Comments
- The only "chip" I'm taking is a bullet. I don't want your paper, I don't want your chip or your fashion or your bullshit. The universe will take care of me. He who holds true to death, will be given eternal life. Never fear, never doubt that YOU cannot die. Nothing dies, ever. Things just move.
  
  visualdiztortion 1 week ago 14
- they have no legal right to pass almost all of the laws that have been passed in the last forty years, they have no legal right to pass the north american union bill, they have no right to pass the ndaa, or cispa, or any of the other evil things they are trying to do to us, but what are you going to do about it?
  
  poop4u2scoop 1 week ago 7
Tamohara dasa ADMIN. June 17, 2012 3:25
At Earth Summit Royal Society and WWF: Humanity is an Unsustainable...
Susanne Posel
Infowars.com
June 17, 2012

The UN’s Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio+20 this month has attracted more than 100 science academies and leaders from all across the globe to discuss population control and human consumption, among other topics of global domination.

Humanity is a viable threat to the eco-system and future of planet Earth, say scientists from the UK’s Royal Society.

“The overall message is that we need a renewed focus on both population and consumption – it’s not enough to look at one or the other,” said Prof Charles Godray from the Martin School at the University of Oxford, who chaired the process of writing the declaration. “We need to look at both, because together they determine the footprint on the world.”

Globalist academics decry humanity’s footprint is getting “heavier and heavier”. They have released a public declaration to coerce developed and developing nations to join forces to combat humanity’s assault on our planet.

The declaration states:

The global population is currently around seven billion, and most projections suggest that it will probably lie between eight and 11 billion by 2050. Global consumption levels are at an all-time high, largely because of the high per-capita consumption of developed countries.

The fear-mongers assert that if governments fail to enact these changes, “will put us on track to alternative futures with severe and potentially catastrophic implications for human well-being.”

Population control and severely limiting human consumption, being discussed at the UN Earth Summit, will admonish governments to agree to “commit to systematically consider population trends and projections in our national, rural and urban development strategies and policies.”

The drafted agreement claims all governments pledge to “change unsustainable consumption and production patterns” to reflect Agenda 21 Sustainable Development policies within sovereign nations so that the UN can usurp authority by ratification of international mandate within individual countries.

The report claims that over population in under-developed countries has resulted in unsustainable consumption worldwide.

Eliya Zulu, executive director of the African Institute for Development Policy in Nairobi, co-author of the report from the Royal Society, says:

Many African countries are feeling the effects of population growth, and are finding they’ll need to deal with it in order to continue developing as well as to address their environmental issues. If you look at a country like Rwanda, it’s one of the most densely populated in Africa and the government believes one of the reasons behind the genocide was high population density and competition for resources. And the economic downturn that started in the late 1980s made people realize that in order to reach the Millennium Development Goals [MDGs], you can’t do it if your population is growing rapidly.

Zulu points out that women in Africa are contributing to the over-population problems, which is causing the need to increase family planning provisions in Africa.

“This is an absolutely critical period for people and the planet, with profound changes for human health and wellbeing and the natural environment,” said Sir John Sulston, the report’s chairman, who headed the Human Genome Project , and currently chairs the Institute for Science Ethics and Innovation . “Where we go is down to human volition – it’s not pre-ordained, it’s not the act of anything outside humanity, it’s in our hands.”

These globalists believe that while more people are born, over-consumption becomes an issue of over-population. Under-developed countries are being blamed for ushering our planet toward destruction because of lack of access to family planning services.

By controlling fertility rates, as well as consumption of food, water and other resources, these experts assert that the environment, CO2 emissions and the status of the planet will be saved.

The Royal Society has used gross national product (GDP) to define how a nation’s economy can sustain its population. Their focus is to protect the environment over the rights of humanity as a whole.

While the UN discusses how to deal with the rising human population, radical environmentalists are speaking at the UN Earth Summit, urging that biodiversity be protected from the effects of humanity.

The World Wildlife Federation (WWF) has also released a report called the Living Planet Report that condemns the ecological disaster our planet is becoming from the direct influence of man.

It was the WWF who published a false report on the polar bear population last year. By purveying the myth that the polar bears are drowning due to ice sheets melting because of global warming, the WWF participated in the alarmism of climate change.

Real world observations from researchers found that polar bear populations are estimated at 66% higher than climate change alarmists predicted.

David Nussbaum, CEO of the WWF in the UK, says:

The Rio+20 conferences are an opportunity for the world to get serious about the need for development to be made sustainable. We need to elevate the sense of urgency, and I think this is ultimately not only about our lives but the legacy we leave for future generations.

The report from the WWF is compiled from data obtained from the Zoological Society of London(ZSL), as well as analysis from the Global Footprint Network (GFN) to further globalist agendas for global sustainability and encompassing the world’s ecological footprint. They assert issues surrounding the use of fossil fuels, deforestation for agricultural use, logging wood, and depleting fish populations as a food source.

The ZSL claims 30% of the species of the world have been in a steady decline since 1970, while tropical species have been waning at a rate of more than 60% because of the destruction to tropical lakes and rivers.

Tim Blackburn, director of the Institute of Zoology at the ZSL, maintains:

Nature is more important than money. Humanity can live without money, but we can’t live without nature and the essential services it provides.

Nations under pressure by the UN and defined as completely unsustainable are:
- Qatar
- Kuwait
- United Arab Emirate countries
- Denmark
- Belgium
- Australia
- Ireland
- United Kingdom
The WWF report points out that 405 river systems are under attack worldwide, as well as the 30% food wastage caused by countries in the West contribute to the global food shortages and infrastructure in under-developed countries.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, has launched a “global conversation” to keep the appearance that the UN is interested in creating the “future we want”.

Through Facebook , Twitter or simply mailing in concerns, the panelists and event participants will answer “questions, expectations, or comments . . . at the event on November 22, 2012 at 10am EST.”

The UN hope to continue to purvey the ruse that they are an international community dedicated to making our world a better place. In the shadows, the globalist Elite lurks and patiently wait while the very right to human existence is stripped from sovereign nations through international directives.

This vision of the future is not what we want.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
Similar/Related Articles

Malthusian Royal Society: World needs to stabilise population &...

Royal Society Believes Depopulation Will Save the Environment

Global population study launched by Royal Society

Earth Summit 2012 Promoters Call For Implementation Of “Personal Ca...

UN’s 2012 “Earth Summit” Devised To Disembowel Sovereignty, Impose ...

MIT Predicts Half of Humanity to Be Culled in Post-Industrial Crash

UN Seeks New Powers to Remake World at Rio Sustainability Summit

Stephen Hawking urges humans to leave Earth to avoid disaster

The Revolution Against Humanity Just Hit DEFCON One

Alex Jones Talks About Humanity’s Struggle & Future Potential

No future for a cashless society

Clinton Advisor: Earth Population “Exceeds Limits”
- Tamohara dasa ADMIN. > Tamohara dasa ADMIN. June 17, 2012 3:27
  MIT Predicts Half of Humanity to Be Culled in Post-Industrial Crash
  
  Researchers claim that only global government can save humanity, echoing MIT/Club of Rome model for collapse by 2030
  
  Aaron Dykes
  Infowars.com
  April 9, 2012
  
  Will 5 billion people perish from the earth in the coming century? That’s what the controversial elitist think tank, the Club of Rome, predicted back in 1972. Decades after its publication, advocates of world government are still pushing its predictions as a call to curb mankind’s footprint on the earth.
  
  Australian physicist Graham Turner has recently made news again after revisiting computer models MIT researchers created for the Club of Rome’s 1972 publication that sees a drastic decline in human population coming in relation to a increasing scarcity of resources. Turner’s basic conclusions, however, give away the agenda in plain sight. “The world is on track for disaster,” he bluntly states, while suggesting that “unlimited economic growth” is still possible if world governments enact policies and invest in green technologies that help limit the expansion of our ecological footprint.
  
  The neo-Malthusian Club of Rome has once again surfaced– at a time when environmentalists are demanding world government to save the earth– to present computer models it developed with MIT. It predicts a stark future where limited resources like oil, food and water supposedly trigger a crash that ends with a precipitous reduction in the human population. The graph, while failing to provide actual numbers on the Y axis, appears to show a world population level in 2100 approximately equal to the almost 4.5 billion people in 1980, a decline of more than 5 billion from projected peak numbers (which could be even higher):
  
  Of course, the Club of Rome/MIT models already predicted that the tipping point for disaster would come by the year 2000, which, like the predictions from Sir Thomas Malthus that population would outgrow the food supply, never came.
  
  Instead, this prediction for disaster reflects aspirations of the elite to stop growth, not a neutral reflection on trends that must be. As we have repeatedly documented, the ruling elites aim to cull the population and drive a post-industrial society that harkens back to the feudalistic era.
  
  The Club of Rome, founded in 1968, is an “environmental” group of, by and for the elitists who want control of earth, its peoples and resources. Indeed, elitism at its height was expressed through the Club of Rome when it published in 1991 that “mankind itself” was the enemy, and man’s usage of resources its destructive weapon against the planet:
  
  “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
  - Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution
  
  Lyndon LaRouche’s Executive Intelligence Review, along with other critics, found in the early 1980s that the MIT-created computer model had been tailored to produce the results Club of Rome founder Aurelio Peccei wanted to show. As authors Phillip Darrell Collins and Paul David Collins summarize:
  
  “The motive for this deception, Peccei contends, is purely an altruistic one. Apparently, the “nobel lie” provided necessary shock treatment” to compel nations to adopt measures of population control (Executive Intelligence Review Special Report, p. 16, 1982). In a critique of The Limits to Growth, Christopher Freeman characterized the MIT group as a collective “Malthus with a computer” (Freeman p. 5, 1975).
  
  In other words, the computer model used by the Club of Rome, like the one now surfacing, is designed not to predict the path of humanity but to steer it. Economist Gunnar Myrdal blasted the model’s attempt to “impress the innocent general public” while holding “little, if any, scientific validity.”
  
  THE ELITES WANT A POST-INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY
  
  The Club of Rome’s Limits to Growth model, like Paul Ehrlich’s Population Bomb, was meant more to shame the public out of their consumption pattern more than it was meant to be a literal prediction. Thus, “confirming” the model produced by MIT remains a confirmation of the intent to curb society’s behavior– conveniently through a world government mechanism.
  
  This is the basic aim of the United Nation’s Agenda 21 and other “sustainable development” programs. They hinge on excitement over the depletion of resources, but many assumptions are made that either prove inaccurate, or that rule out the adoption of alternatives.
  
  Consider the fact that even mainstream outlets like Bloomberg have had to concede the myth of peak oil, with new discoveries and existing sources making a mockery of claims that the fuel would disappear. Whether or not oil will remain desirable over alternative fuels is a different question, but current sources can easily last the world hundreds of years.
  
  Instead, as Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson exposed back in 2005, the ruse is put forward to condition society for artificial scarcity. Cutting off the average human’s access to crude is quite different than its actual availability.
  
  Moreover, as Forbes online points out, the Club of Rome study has been constantly updated, and moreover, the current “confirmation” dismisses the use of any real alternatives. The possibilities are there, but have the elites chosen not to embrace other solutions? Why?
  
  Tim Worstall quotes first from Graham Tuner’s paper:
  
  To account for substitutability between resources a simple and robust position has been taken. First, it is assumed here that metals and minerals will not substitute for bulk energy resources such as fossil fuels.
  
  Then adds:
  
  So if we’re not running out of metals and minerals but we are substituting metals and minerals for fossil fuels then the idea that actually, the Club of Rome were quite right looks a bit odd, doesn’t it?
  
  The availability and affordability of food is being challenged not by the ability to grow and supply, but by speculators driving up costs. Biofuels, namely corn-derived ethanol, are exacerbating this dilemma by dedicating acreage to fuel-over-food production, threatening billions with potential starvation due to bad policy.
  
  Further, GMO crops have been heavily pushed on the illusory promise that they will provide more yields. But the failure of these crops to produce more food will cause a greater disaster by destroying traditional agriculture via costly terminator seeds that have already proved so costly they are triggering one of the largest ongoing epidemics of suicide in India the world has ever seen.
  
  The availability of clean water is challenged by many factors, but among them is the widespread contamination with pharmaceuticals and estrogen-mimicking compounds like Bisphenol-A, which have become ubiquitous in consumer life yet oddly are connected with the growing problem of infertility, as well as a spike in cancers, deformities and gender bending in both human and wildlife populations.
  
  Again, the elite are driving these policies. The claim of humanity’s potential to over-consume at “unsustainable” levels is not without merit, but it lacks serious focus when it immediately blames the masses instead of those calling the shots.
  
  MIT’s calculations in the Limits to Growth publication are thus a bit fuzzy for these reasons and numerous others. It’s not that man is unable to destroy himself that is disputed, but instead it is clear that the oligarchical tier of humanity is bent on achieving the destruction– of the bottom 80% of the world’s population. And that is simply not recognized.
  
  The strategy is mirrored by Bill Gates, as demonstrated at his 2010 TED talk. There he contrives a formula predicting collapse unless mankind curbs population, energy consumption, services and CO2 output. “Probably one of these numbers has to get pretty close to zero,” Gates quips, hinting at population numbers as the key variable.
  
  The elite want to frame the debate around trade offs in a zero-sum game, ultimately suggesting the negative worth of human individuals. True innovation could get us out of this dilemma, but would those in power entertain such notions?
  
  As Mac Slavo observes, it is the unsustainability of the financial spectrum that is most likely candidate to contribute to widespread death, destruction and loss of standard of living:
  
  There is a strong case to be made that the issuance of trillions of dollars in debt over the course of the last several decades, much like oil, will become impossible to sustain. Since the entire system of consumption is essentially based on this debt, if confidence in this system is lost, it may very well have the same initial effect as a peak oil breaking point. Debt, even when fabricated out of thin air, is essentially a promise tied to some sort of resource. It is based on the idea that something will eventually be created by someone in order to make good on the debt. By all accounts, we the people are the collateral for all of this debt floating our in the system. But, it has gotten to the point that the debt – somewhere in the range of $200 trillion in the United States alone – far outweighs our ability to harness enough time and energy to repay the principal with interest.
  
  Thus, this ‘peak debt’ created to save us from the unsustainable resource practices we face should be just as big of a concern as peak oil or water. Because when we finally reach the limit of our debt, and it becomes clear that the collateral backing that debt is unable to produce enough yield to pay it back, we’ll have a whole new meaning for the term ‘collateral damage.’
  
  Similar/Related Articles
  
  Peak Civilization: MIT Research Team Predicts Global Economic Colla...
  
  Free Humanity’s Bill of Particulars Against the New World Order
  
  BP’s Rosneft Deal Replaces Reserves Lost in Post-Spill Sales at Hal...
  
  Oil Industry Insider and CFR Member Predicts Gulf Evacuation
  
  Humans ‘using one and a half planets’ worth of resources and will n...
  
  Alan Watt: The Neo-Eugenics War On Humanity
  
  Half of new UK jobs are created by the state
  
  Half of India’s cities have no piped water or sewer systems
  
  Caging Humanity
  
  Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology: H1N1 May Hit...
  
  The Revolution Against Humanity Just Hit DEFCON One
  
  WHO predicts ‘explosion’ of swine flu cases
Tamohara dasa ADMIN. June 17, 2012 6:27