http://www.harekrsna.org/pada/documents/poisonbook-3.htm
REVERSE SPEECH THEORY
What may eventually become recognized as one of the greatest discoveries of the modern age, reverse speech is a phenomenon that was discovered by an Australian insurance broker, John David Oates. Oates has researched reverse speech for many years and has founded the David Oates Reverse Speech Association with chapters all over the world. His website at "reverse speech" is very helpful in educating the newcomer, and it includes many illustrative examples, such as some on the President Clinton- Monica Lewinsky controversy. Clinton's denial of involvement with Lewinsky is reversed to say, "She's a fun girl to kiss."
Most people are familiar with the hidden messages embedded in "backward masking" on rock and roll records, begun by the Beatles in the 1960's. Innocuous, satanic, or meaningless messages and words were "reverse-buried" in the forward music and could only be discovered by manually turning the turntable backwards. A furor arose in the 1980's over the phenomenon, and legislation was even passed in some locales restricting such reverse messages, lest the youth be secretly brainwashed with satanic messages. Upon closer examination, it was found that many of the angry and "heavy metal" lyrics contained shockingly clear satanic phrases in reverse, phrases that had not been intentionally designed or embedded, but just were.
Oates discovered that recordings of music, speeches, arguments, conversation, even infant babies' pre-speech sounds, were filled with intelligible and hidden messages simultaneous to the forward sound recording. He found that all human verbal communication contains not only overt and conscious messages but also covert and unconscious messages as well. The "reverse speech" confirmed the forward speech, and often contained more truthful and unabashed messages. Oates accumulated an immense repertoire of studies on the various forms and structures of speech reversals, and how they related to the subconscious mind. He developed a detailed theory of the verbal human communication process called The Theory of Reverse Speech and Speech Complementarity.
Oates' theory states that human speech contains two separate and complementary modes which are interdependent. The conscious, forward mode is produced by conscious cognitive processes. The unconscious, reverse mode, spoken simultaneously with the forward mode, is produced by subconscious cognitive processes. Integrally, the two modes constitute a communication of the total psyche of a person, conscious and unconscious. While a person may say one thing formally in forward speech, examination in reverse often reveals his true message, feelings, or purpose.
The frequency of reverse messages increases dramatically when the speaker is emotionally aroused, occurring up to every 2 or 3 seconds. Emotions are a function of the right side of the brain, while forward speech is generated from the left hemisphere. Thus the two sides of the brain work together to produce and choose forward speech words that simultaneously form intelligible words in reverse speech. The wonders of the brain! Thus we see often that an emotional speaker may pause, stutter, and fumble over his choice of wording as he speaks. The brain becomes very busy blending the conscious and subconscious messages into one communication. Our unconscious thoughts and feelings are thus expressed in reverse speech.
The implications of reverse speech are enormous. There will be very few secrets anymore. Truth will become prevalent as deceit and dishonesty can be exposed easily. Politicians and cheating spouses, beware! David Oates has discovered the ultimate lie detector, or rather, truth detector. May truthfulness once again prevail. Suspects in crimes may now be interviewed and the "truth of their words" can be ascertained by reverse speech analysis. Speech reversal has already become a popular tool with law enforcement agencies to ferret out leads and information useful in solving crimes. Speech reversals were employed in the Jean Bennet Ramsey murder case, for example. Reverse speech has not been accepted as legal evidence in court as yet, however. The science is in its early stages of research and acceptance.
Reverse speech is a universal language as much as is forward speech. We all speak and hear both at the same time. Reverse speech contains:
1. similar or different information than the corresponding forward speech,
2. and its own peculiar language involving a variety in the syntax, tense, and intended audience.
Reverse speech is extremely direct in its language and content; it is not diplomatic, polite, or obscure. It gets right to the point and is often profane and unabashed, communicating the unconscious psyche explicitly and completely truthfully. Reverse speech is always truthful, and when it contradicts the forward speech, the conclusion is that the speaker is knowingly lying. Reverse speech is interesting in that it contains information about what is really on a person's mind, either consciously or unconsciously. Often it provides additional information not spoken in forward.
Reverse speech can be either "external dialogue" or "internal dialogue," spoken to others or to oneself. Sometimes, "link reversals" will appear where two or more speakers each contribute a piece to a single message in reverse. The subconscious minds are communicating while we are absorbed in the conscious arena. A wealth of secrets lie dormant within, accumulated from past communications in the subconscious.
Acoustic analysis of speech has identified features such as frequency, amplitude, harmonic structure, resonance, co-articulation effects, accents, cadence and more. As a result, a forward spoken word, phrase, or sentence will most often produce totally different speech reversals from one time to the next and one person to the next. Reverse speech is not coincidence or a simple mechanical phenomenon. Obviously, sometimes words spoken forward will coincidentally sound like something intelligible in reverse. But reverse speech is far beyond coincidence, being a veritable language of communication that has been verified and studied by dozens of researchers over the last decade.
Reverse speech will often discuss emotions or events not contained in the content of forward speech. The subconscious mind assists in producing forward speech by constructing meaningful, grammatically correct phrases and statements in reverse that are recognized by others' subconscious minds. In other words, during communication, we have the conscious discussion and also on another level, the subconscious discussion. The conscious secrets of one are communicated to others subconsciously through reverse speech.
The subconscious, however, "thinks" in pictures and thus communicates with metaphors, many of which are common to the language of reverse speech. Examples are pa for father, muck for mess up, hurt, etc, and so on. As much as forward speech languages comprise a wide range of disciplines and branches of science due to its vastness of complexity and diversity, so also reverse speech is only understood in the beginning stages of its own complexity and diversity. In studying speech reversals, one must master the art and become proficient after some training in the field. There are increasing numbers of professionals and amateurs alike who are becoming expert in this exciting and revolutionary field.
Doubt of the validity of reverse speech is natural, but after one actually researches the subject, usually the criticism melts and is transformed into awe, curiosity, and amazement. The astounding truth of reverse speech will make a believer of any honest person and change their lives forever. Hopefully the development of research into the reverse speech phenomenon will also change the world for the better.
CHAPTER 38:
REVERSE SPEECH ANALYSIS
Reverse speech analysis is becoming increasingly popular with law enforcement agencies who use cutting edge technology to assist in their investigations and gathering of evidence to use in the prosecution of criminals. Obviously it would be of great interest, and possibly of great application, to research the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada with reverse speech analysis. Those who were close to Srila Prabhupada and who were His caretakers or leading, dedicated servants might reveal much critical information if the tape recordings of 1977 were subjected to such study. Suspects and those who may have conversed with the poisoners, whoever they may be, could be holding critical information about Srila Prabhupada's poisoning in their subconscious minds. Also, if interviews could be obtained in the present day of those who were there in 1977 or those who are poisoning suspects, reverse speech could open the door to solving the investigation's dilemma of crossing a span of 22 years to discover what really happened.
Dhaneshwar Prabhu joined the Krishna Consciousness movement and was initiated as a disciple of Srila Prabhupada in the early 1970's. He has been actively involved in Hare Krishna temples since then, devoting his life to the mission of his spiritual father, acting as temple officer, BBT production manager, and publisher of the Hare Krishna Directory in 1992. He was the Vancouver temple president 1993-4. As a side interest, he has always been handy with sound recording procedures and equipment, and has a background in that area from his college education. In 1995-1996 he became interested in the reverse speech phenomenon and studied under David Oates, conducting his own research and experimentation. In late 1997 Dhaneshwar heard about the "poison whispers" and obtained the "poison tape" to study in reverse. He was quickly shocked and depressed. The confirmation of poisoning was clearly indicated in the reversals.
Dhaneshwar then spent hundreds of hours studying all the recorded conversations of late October and November 1977, a total of twenty-five tapes. The result was that repeated confirmations turned up in the speech reversals of several persons that Srila Prabhupada was indeed poisoned. He became convinced that the unthinkable crime was a fact, and proceeded to document his studies carefully, compiling hundreds of pages of research on three hundred and fifty (350) speech reversals. Dhaneshwar discovered a very high level of consistency in the indications of foul play and malicious intent throughout the reversals.
Dhaneshwar suffered from conflicting emotions as a consequence of his discovery and the compilation of "poison" reversals into a manuscript ready for press. How should he use it? What would be the most effective use of his work in assisting the investigations? Should he publish his work now or later? How should it be presented to have a constructive effect? He sent his work to Balavanta and Naveen Krishna Prabhus, receiving polite but limited feedback. He showed his work to several devotees for advice, and somehow copies of his work began to circulate "underground" in certain circles of devotees. This reporter has encouraged him to not wait further, but to go ahead and publish his work, and that would be the best course to take in the furtherance of discovering the whole truth of Srila Prabhupada's poisoning. This reporter has studied Dhaneshwar's work and become convinced that the science is bonafide and that his reversals are accurate. The consistency and inter-locking verifications of details were amazing and obviously authentic.
The reversals point to certain individuals as being complicitly involved in the assassination of the pure devotee of the Supreme Lord, Srila Prabhupada, namely Tamal Krishna Goswami, Bhakticharu Swami, Bhavananda, Jayapataka, and the kaviraja Sastriji. Others were unconsciously aware of the poisoning by dint of communicating with those who were involved. The discussions therefore contain reversals acknowledging poisoning in the speech of non-conspirators as well, such as Hansadutta and Lokanath Swami. Other reversals showed Brahmananda and Swarup Damodar to be not involved.
The self-talk, confessions, guilt, conflicting emotions, motivations, and attitudes revealed by Dhaneshwar's extensive study are extremely shocking and almost too much to absorb at once by anyone who has any devotion to Srila Prabhupada. However, Dhaneshwar was never a critic of ISKCON until he discovered these reversals, and his work's authenticity and veracity is thoroughly convincing. Almost every voice on the poison tape contains reversals confirming a poisoning of Srila Prabhupada, using the words muck, pa, arsh, and arsenic.
According to the reversals, the following individuals were studied:
Kaviraja: Fully complicit in the poisoning, but distressed and concerned for Srila Prabhupada. He expressed fear as a motive for maintaining secrecy, and was apparently also bribed and bullied. Reversals only:
- "He create a sick pa"
- "They've made your dying problem"
The following are forward speech and the reversals found therein.
Bhakticharu Swami: Received financial compensation for his involvement.
- "This same medicine will continue till..." = "Not bring the sin in medicine"
- "the same medicine, Srila Prabhupada" = "I kill, this brings some benefit"
- "Bengali speech" = "That's sure wicked: make me rich"
Lokanath Swami: He subconsciously realized the crime at hand, became angry and protested in his reversals.
1. "And if we travel" = "you arshed with him"
- "...two devotees out..." = "Was it overdose?"
Hansadutta subconsciously protested the poisoning also, asking why had they poisoned Srila Prabhupada.
Tamal Krishna Goswami: Revealed conflicting emotions, those of love and indebtedness to Srila Prabhupada, but also of revenge and maliciousness.
- "under your care" = "I kill you now"
- "and turn off the light. Would you..." = "Fail upon arsenic"
- "travelling all over India, Srila Prabhupada" = "You're not gonna shame me along the life"
- "we're here chanting" = "masquerade the milk"
- "translating or otherwise" = "S'know that I'm the emperor"
- "to cook for you" = "We fuck it"
- "Sankaracharya line will..." = "Oh, now they arshed a cup"
- "Well, if he does not come" = "Muck inside you flow"
Srila Prabhupada: He acknowledges in reverse the poisoning, sees the celestial "starship" waiting for His departure, and subconsciously communicates with Tamal to stop the poisoning.
1. "But he has not also come?" = "Muck my soul, how dare you do?"
2. "to move me from this..." = "You want me money"
- "educated?" = "You make me sick"
- "let me try to travel" = "The worst was, just you kill"
- "That Maricha..." = "We feed on death"
Unknown devotee:
- "risk in traveling" = "hail of arsenic"
- "how can you call me jolly?" = "Are you mucking pa?"
(Reversals above are copyrighted by Dhaneshwar/ Don Rousse; from his study, Are You Mucking Pa?: A Reverse Speech Investigation of the Death of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, 1998)
The full impact of these reversals in their complementations with other reversals, their exact contexts, their links, and much more can only be appreciated in the study by Dhaneshwar as a whole. The above is just a tiny sampling of his enormous research, and it is hoped that he will soon publish his very well detailed work.
Controversial it is, but reverse speech analysis may provide or point to all the details of Srila Prabhupada's poisoning, as it already has done with the research of one very concerned and disturbed follower of Srila Prabhupada (Dhaneshwar Prabhu). Further validation of these findings are looked forward to so that the truth may be established where otherwise the secrets of darkness would remain hidden forever. May the truth set us free, and the poisoners in prison!
Comments
&
a Man is Poisoned
It Is Said Like That
A Reverse Speech Investigation Into the Death of His Divine Grace
A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Researched and Written
By a servant of the Servant
Dhanesvara das
"This is a tale of murder in its lowest, most despicable state, for who but the most heinous of characters could think even for a moment to kill a great soul whose only business was to relieve mankind of their material bondage by teaching that greatest of all life's blessings—love of God? Yet it happened, and you will hear the irrefutable proof directly spoken from the mouths of those who actually did it, and confirmed by those who were there at the time. It is these direct confessions heard in Reverse Speech that have convinced me that Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada was indeed brought to death's door by poisoning, and I believe that after you hear the evidence and read the story that you will agree with me also."
The Discovery and History of Reverse Speech
The discovery of Reverse Speech, like so many important discoveries in this world, came as an accident, or perhaps we should say, serendipity. Its discovery came about as a result of an intentional act, a marketing ploy by entertainers who led a generation with their creative endeavors—the Beatles. Perhaps as a means to turn around their failing popularity as a result of a serious faux pax, saying that they were more popular than Christ, the Beatles intentionally dubbed a soundtrack in reverse onto one of their recordings. The idea was to challenge fans to see if they could find hidden verbal messages. It worked. All over the world people were buying Beatles albums and recordings of other performers and manually rotating their turntables backwards to see if they could hear the messages. The surprise however, was that along with the messages that were intentionally placed in reverse, other messages, references to Satan, were also found—messages which seemed to confirm what some had believed all along—rock and roll music was inspired by the devil!
Messages intentionally recorded in reverse came to be known as "backward masking" and when the recording was played in reverse they were as intelligible and clear as any forward recording was. When the record was played in regular forward mode the backward masking was usually "buried" among the guitar riffs so as to be "masked," and not meant to be heard well. These messages varied among performers from straightforward communications to cryptic and mysterious messages which may have had no factual meaning.
The search for backward masked messages led to the surprise findings of other intelligible sounds, and many references to Satan. The morality of people in the '70's was still such that this was shocking to many people (Good thing it wasn't discovered in the '90's—it might just have been written off as "normal"). Such findings led to the thorough examination of hundreds of rock music recordings in reverse, and the findings of many references to Satan and hell. Parents became concerned that their children were being unwittingly subjected to satanic programming, ministers railed against the decadence of rock and roll music, and legislation was even introduced in California to require record publishers to warn listeners of any records which intentionally had backward sounds recorded.
One Person Listened Further
While the sensation of backward masking and satanic messages was tormenting the more righteous among us, no one it seems had the curiosity of looking at the phenomena further—except for one inspired individual in Australia, David John Oates, a former insurance broker. Working at the time as a youth counselor, those in his charge had come to him with the shocking news. David, in an effort to dispel the idea, rigged a tape player to play in reverse, and found out that it was indeed true—intelligible messages were found when recording were played in reverse. He also had the initiative to see if the phenomena was limited to music, or if such messages were also present in other forms of communication.
He began to play all types of recordings backwards—speeches, conversation, arguments, infants cooing and babbling—and made what will surely come to be known as one of the most significant discoveries of all time: all human verbal communication has not just a public face, the one meant to be shown, but it also has a hidden side, one that is covert but which communicates nonetheless, additional information which is just as, or perhaps even more important than, the sounds which we consciously hear.
David became very involved in the study of speech reversals and eventually labeled this form of communication "Reverse Speech," a very descriptive moniker. His study became very thorough. He documented a variety of forms and structures of reversals and categorized them, and connected the voices of the reversals with the understanding of the subconscious and collective unconscious as put forward by Carl Jung. The study became quite deep and detailed, and gradually evolved to a general theory of verbal human communication. The theory, developed over a decade of research, contributes immensely to our understanding of the communication process, and brings to humanity a new and bright horizon in communication to see and explore.
The Theory of Reverse Speech and Speech Complimentarity
Oates' called his general theory of verbal human communication The Theory of Reverse Speech and Speech Complimentarity and it addresses the significant features of Reverse Speech. It states that 1) Human speech has two distinctive and complementary functions and modes, and 2) these two modes of speech are dependent upon each other.
The Overt, or Conscious, Mode is spoken forwards and is constructed by conscious cognitive processes. The Covert, or Unconscious, Mode, spoken simultaneously with the Overt Mode, is a reversal of forward speech sounds constructed by subconscious processes. Together they form an integral part of communication, and both modes of speech together communicate the total psyche of a person—conscious as well as unconscious.
But How Does It Happen?
How does Reverse Speech happen? How does the human mind construct cognitive, meaningful communication in reverse while speech goes on forward? Oates' research has shown that speech reversals occur with greater frequency when the speaker is more emotionally charged. Formal speeches have very few reversals, perhaps one every two to three minutes. As a person speaks in a more informal and relaxed environment the reversals increase in number. And when a person is highly emotionally aroused the reversals will occur with a frequency of every 2-3 seconds.
These findings show that emotions play an important role in Reverse Speech. Emotions have been shown to be a function of the right hemisphere of the brain. Hence, Reverse Speech Theory suggests that while the left side of the brain generates the overt, forward speech, it is the right side of the brain which contributes the covert, reverse speech. The right side of the brain then must work in conjunction with the left side of the brain so that the words chosen in overt communication will create sounds which form the intelligible sounds of the covert communication. An amazing feat! This can account for a speaker's pauses, stammerings, and fumbling over the choice of words as he speaks. The words are we choose to express our conscious mind are in part selected by the unconscious mind to communicate our unconscious thoughts.
The Many Parts of Reverse Speech
Reverse Speech is as universal a language as forward speech—everyone speaks it, and we all hear it. However, Reverse Speech differs in many ways from normal forward speech. Thousands of hours of studying many tens of thousands of speech reversals by Oates has revealed significant variety in:
* the information content of reversals spoken,
* the language of Reverse Speech,
* the syntax of reversals,
* the tense,
* and the intended audience for the reversals.
It should be noted that this work has been pioneered largely by David Oates but has subsequently been confirmed by dozens of Reverse Speech investigators over the years. This report adds nothing original to Oates' work, but reports what he has learned through years of tedious research.
Information Content
The information content of speech reversals may be similar or it may be quite different than the information conveyed in forward speech. Speech reversals are very direct in their content and language—there is no need for politeness, the need is to communicate. Consequently reversals are direct and to the point, frequently profane, and unabashed, communicating our psyche in the most direct and explicit way. Additionally, an amazing fact is that speech reversals are never deceptive or untrue. This bears repeating. The information content of speech reversals is always the truth, and as such are a most effective "truth detector." What is heard in Reverse Speech is always the truth. When forward speech contradicts Reverse Speech this indicates that the speaker knowingly spoke a lie. This has been confirmed by thousands of reversals analyzed by dozens of investigators of Reverse Speech.
The information content of Reverse Speech has been shown to be what was on the person's mind (the conscious mind or the unconscious mind) when they spoke. This frequently, but not always, relates to or compliments what is being said in forward speech. It may also expand on, and add additional information to the conversation.
Complementary relationships between forward and reverse speech can also appear in a number of ways. The reversals may be what has been termed "external dialogue" meaning that it is meant to be communicated to others, or may be "internal dialogue" or "self-talk" directed to one's own self. Amazingly, single reversals may even be constructed by two or more speakers who will each construct a portion of the reversal, this has been given the label of "Link Reversal" and there are several Link Reversals presented in this analysis.
An important category for the topic at hand is that of comparative reversals, reversals which discuss events and/or emotions that are outside of the topic of the forward speech. They are not complimentary with the forward speech, but they compliment the emotional state of the speaker. Comparative Reversals will also often reveal an event or belief in a person's life (past or present) that has similar emotions attached to it. Given that all of the dialogue analyzed in this study was recorded in the immediate vicinity of Prabhupada as he lay emaciated and close to death there was intense emotions experienced by everyone. These emotions drew out many comparative speech reversals that spoke directly to the cause of Prabhupada's circumstance—the poisoning.
When people first hear of the phenomena of Reverse Speech it seems so fantastic and beyond belief that there is a tendency to assign it to coincidence. The frequent challenge is that anyone saying a specific phrase forward will create the same speech reversals. Very brief experimentation shows this to be false, and a very notable example is found in the speech reversals on the words "Srila Prabhupada" herein. These same words said by the same person gives totally different reversals in some cases, and the same in others; just as two or more people saying the same words forwards will create very different words in reverse. This makes Reverse Speech even that much more phenomenal.
There are many aspects to spoken sounds beyond the words we hear. Speech researchers have identified the various features of acoustic analysis of speech as frequency, amplitude, harmonic structure and resonance. Beyond that there are co-articulation effects, accents, and cadence. It is all of these rich features of speech which work together to produce in reverse either meaningless sounds, or meaningful words and sentences. The nature of speech is so extremely complex that creation of voice recognition systems have been one of the greatest challenges in the computer industry. The simple fact is that the subconscious mind assists in the way we produce sounds so that they will form meaningful, grammatically correct statements or words in reverse, and this action of the mind-brain connection is not something which is repeatable by others.
There are certain words whose reversals generally do sound the same for everyone who speaks them, but those words are limited to about 40 in number, and they have no presence in the reversals presented here.
The Language of Reverse Speech
Reverse Speech uses very efficient, and often not polite, words and phrases. It is not uncommon for Reverse Speech to contain explicit sexual words rather than the innuendo appropriate to socially polite conversation. More significantly however, reverse speech makes great use of metaphors to communicate efficiently and effectively. Just as we use metaphors to convey concepts and ideas in forward speech we do so in Reverse Speech. Additionally, these metaphors are used in a universal manner making Reverse Speech a unique language unto itself.
David Oates' twelve year study of many thousands of reversals have shown metaphors to be particularly significant in communicating messages from the individual's own subconscious, and even perhaps, from the "collective unconscious" described by Carl Jung, or what Prabhupada's followers understand as the Supersoul. Unlike the conscious mind with thinks in language, the unconscious mind "thinks" in pictures and communicates those pictures as the metaphors heard in Reverse Speech. Reverse Speech metaphors are verbal descriptions of pictures that are currently being viewed on an unconscious level, and an understanding of the metaphors of Reverse Speech gives us great insight to the workings of the unconscious mind. Because of their use of communicating the emotions it is found that the metaphoric content of speech reversals increases as the conversation becomes more emotionally charged.
Attachment Two
A complete report of Don Rousse's claimed reversals as posted on his website. Click on the reversal to download Don's wavefile.
Reversal One: Save Me - non existent. Does not meet research check points. Sounds more like SaGe Mit
Reversal Two: We feed on death - non existent. Does not meet check point points. "Feed" sounds more like "Feel" and the word death is very imprecise.
Reversal Three: The worst was just you kill - this is a valid reversal.
All check point criteria are met. However, it does not refer to poisoning. All reversals are complementarity, in other words they must be considered in context with the forward dialogue which appears to be a discussion of a spiritual journey and the death of the ego.
Reversal Four: We shouldn't be killed - non existent. Pure projection into gibberish
Reversal Five - Aye Govinda / Lord, I'll follow - the first is genuine and it appears to be a statement of loyalty. The second reversal is imprecise and does not meet reversal check points.
Reversal Six: I kill you now - non existent, sounds similar but does not meet check points
Reversal Seven: I kill the Prophet - this is a genuine reversal reversal. It meets all the check points. But to call it a confession to murder is irresponsible at best. For a start is the word "prophet"or "profit" . Also "kill" is metaphor for emotional death. Without the corresponding forward dialogue to examine, it is impossible to determine the meaning of this reversal.
Reversal Eight: God does know we did it - incorrect - Does not meet check points. "God" can also be heard as "Guard" and "did it" can also be heard as "didn't"
Reversal Nine: Fail upon arsenic - borderline reversal.reversal. I personally would not document it but it does meet some check points.
Although Fail can also be heard as "Fell" and arsenic is a very common Reverse Speech metaphor that refers to negative and destructive emotions, NOT poison.
Reversal Ten: Sin off us if this shit hid - invalid reversal. Not even close. Pure projection into gibberish.
Reversal Eleven - cannot check this reversal as the file corrupted on his site.
Reversal Twelve: I been really corrupt - invalid reversal - pure projection into gibberish.
Reversal Thirteen: Heavy metal, that milk. - This reversals exists and meets all the check requirements. However, once again with no forward dialogue to check back with, it is extremely difficult to place a meaning on it Also, "milk" is a common reverse speech metaphor for spiritual food and nourishment and does not mean "milk" as in the substance we drink. This reversal could simply mean "It is a tough road to follow the spiritual path"
Reversal Fourteen: He create a sick pa - valid reversal but no forward dialogue to place context.
Reversal Fifteen: They're made your dying problem - valid reversal but once again no forward dialogue. It is impossible to determine its meaning.
Reversal Sixteen: Hail of arsenic - invalid reversal. Does not meet check point requirements.
Summary
Of the 17 reversals I was able to check, 11 of them were invalid and one was imprecise, leaving a total of 5 reversals that could be documented.
This is appalling!! At Reverse Speech, we require at least an 80% correct rate to certify an analyst. Don Rousse does not even meet the minimum requirements. . Additionally, the reversals that are correct are probably metaphoric statements that refer to emotional and spiritual states and not physical acts.
Conclusion
Rousse's report is bogus, poorly documented and should not be taken seriously. I would suggest a court injunction to remove the book from publication. You would certainly have my support in this as he is using proprietary materials that require permission from myself to use. Not only was the permission not obtained but, IT WAS SPECIFICALLY DENIED.
Copyright © 1997-2000 Reverse Speech 21st Century
Forum Discussion
Related VNN StoriesComment on this storyNext StoriesContact VNN about this storyNext StoriesSend this story to a friend
How useful is the information in this article? Not Somewhat Very -
This story URL: http://www.vnn.org/world/WD0002/WD08-5437.html
PRABHUPADA THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF EVERYTHING HE PREACHED
mind controlled ANIMAL?
THE PERSON THE ILLUMINATI DON'T
WANT YOU TO HEAR!
AND CHANTING WITH
SRILA PRABHUPADA
NEEDED TO DEFEAT
THE ILLUMINATI!
WHY DON'T YOU
ACCEPT HIM?"
THE ILLUMINATI BRAINWASHING
has made us DULL
to SIMPLE TRUTH
MUST BE STOPPED!
Divide and Conquer DESTROYED!
"Nothing happens accidentally"
That's what the ILLUMINATI want
to HIDE!
Don't be a DOG!
Inquire about the SOUL!!!
TRYING TO DESTROY PRABHUPADA'S
SPIRITUAL MISSION?
Predicted 911
& Reptilian Man Eaters
The SCIENCE of GOD
Hear Sinister Whispers
of Illuminati Poisoning Prabhupada
I've been poisoned."
poisoned me."
PRABHUPADA POISONED.
A REVERSE SPEECH STUDY
PRABHUPADA TRIES TO SAVE HIS KILLER!
Prabhupada Departs Surrounded by
Crocodile Tears
the Illuminati Moon Landing Hoax
For over 200 Prabhupada videos click HERE or HERE
OTHER VIDEO'S
BY MANTRA MEDITATION.
WORLD ORDER MOVEMENT
NEED TO UNDERSTAND
ILLUMINATI MENTALITY
REVEALED
SPEAKS OUT!!!
TO GOVARHANA
VOITHS KRISHNA COWS EXILED
FROM ANGELICA, NY
GURU BUSINESS- PREFACE -
A RUDE AWAKENING BY SULOCANA PRABHU
IRRELEVANT SUBJECT!!!
GOVINDA JAYA JAYA